FantasyWhich OnlyFans agencies publish their commission rate, and which of them say what it is charged on
FantasyRise publishes 30–60% of net, charged after the platform's 20%, and leaves the creator 70% of net at the 30% end. Ten agencies put a number on their own site. Six of them say whether that number is taken before or after the platform's 20%, and FantasyRise is the one that writes it into its terms. The second column is worth more than the first, and it is the emptier of the two.
Short answer
Of the ten agencies we have found that publish a commission figure at all, the published rates run from 15% to 60%, read on 1 October 2026. Full management charged on net runs from 25% to 60%; the two figures below that are tied to a narrower base, chat revenue only in one case and gross revenue in the other. As of 1 October 2026, these agencies publish a commission figure on their own sites: FantasyRise (30% to 60% of net, and 30% to 50% on the Growth Track for creators already earning about $5,000 a month; the creator keeps 70% at the 30% end), Foxy Studios (45%, creator keeps 55%), Hussar (a 50/50 split), SVJ Talent (20%, 17% or 15% by monthly revenue, on chat revenue only), SirenCY (35%), Bunny Agency (25% to 50%), Vantage Agency (30% to 50%), OnModelStudios (25% to 55% of net), Hush Talent (20% of gross managed revenue for full management, 15% of deal value on brand deals) and MANGO (a 50/50 split, in its homepage FAQ). Every one of those ten was read on the agency's own site.
Of those ten, six state what the rate is charged on. One states it in its terms rather than in marketing copy, and that one is FantasyRise. Foxy Studios says it plainly on its homepage, "OnlyFans takes 20% first. Our flat 45% agency fee is calculated on what's left". Hussar defines net revenue as the amount after the platform's 20% and applies the split to that. SVJ Talent states a third base entirely, chat revenue only, with subscription revenue never commissioned. OnModelStudios says the same thing in its FAQ and its calculator, "earnings after platform fees", which is net. MANGO answers it in full, on its homepage, its legal page and its terms page alike: 50/50 "always calculated on net revenue, meaning what OnlyFans actually pays out after its 20% platform fee, never on gross fan spend". The remaining four split three ways. Hush Talent says "gross managed revenue" and never mentions the platform fee, so whether that is before or after the 20% is open. SirenCY and Bunny Agency both say, in so many words, that the base goes in the agreement and not on the site. Vantage does not raise the question. A percentage without its base is half a price, and on $10,000 of fan spend the missing half is worth $700 a month at 35%.
TDM Management, Teasy Agency, XCreatorMgmt and TopStar do not publish a figure. That is the industry norm and not by itself a warning sign. It does mean you cannot compare them until you have booked calls with all of them.
FantasyRise manages OnlyFans accounts on published terms: 30–60% of net, no minimum term, no notice period. Applying takes about a minute, and Helge reads it himself and replies the same day.
The table
One row per agency, in the order of how much a creator can learn from the published number. Every row says where the figure came from and whether we checked it on the agency's own site or are reporting what a directory says. If you are an agency on this table and a figure is wrong or has changed, the correction process is at the bottom and takes a day.
| Agency | Published rate | What the creator keeps | The base, in one of four states | Where it is stated | How we know |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FantasyRise | 30–60%; 30–50% on the Growth Track, from about $5,000 a month | 70% of net at the 30% end, 40% at the 60% end | Net, stated | Starter and Growth pages, with the reason for each end | Our own terms |
| Foxy Studios | 45%, single figure, creator keeps 55% | 55% of net, their own wording | Net, stated. "OnlyFans takes 20% first. Our flat 45% agency fee is calculated on what's left, you keep 55%" | Their homepage, and their own agency comparison article | Read on foxy-studios.com, 15 September 2026 |
| Hussar | 50%, single figure, a 50/50 split | 50% of net | Net, stated. Their billing section defines "Net Revenue" as the amount after OnlyFans takes its 20% platform fee, and applies the split to that | Their site, billing section | Read on hussarofm.com, 15 September 2026 |
| SVJ Talent | Tiered: 20% from $25,000 a month, 17% from $50,000, 15% from $100,000 | 80% to 85% of chat revenue, and all subscription revenue | A third base, stated: chat revenue only. "Subscription revenue is never subject to SVJ commission." Their worked example assumes chat is 70% of gross | Their site, pricing section | Read on svjtalent.com, 15 September 2026 |
| SirenCY | 35%, single figure | 65%, of a base their agreement defines | Deferred to the agreement, explicitly. "Your agreement documents the calculation basis"; the fee row of their own example table reads "Basis defined in agreement" | sirency.com/models, FAQ "How much does SirenCY charge?" | Read on sirency.com, 11 September 2026 |
| Bunny Agency | 25–50% | 50% to 75%, of a base their agreement defines | Deferred to the agreement, explicitly. "The exact rate for your account, and the revenue it applies to, go in writing before anything is signed" | bunny-agency.com/onlyfans-agency-contract/ | Read on bunny-agency.com, 11 September 2026 |
| Vantage Agency | 30–50% | 50% to 70%, of a base not stated | Not addressed. The question is not raised anywhere on the page | Their site | Checked for our comparison, 10 September 2026 |
| OnModelStudios | 25% to 55% of net | 45% to 75% of net | Net, stated. "What 'net' means here: What the platform pays out to you after its own 20% cut. Commission is never charged on your gross" | Their homepage FAQ and calculator | Read on onmodelstudios.com/facts, 19 September 2026 |
| Hush Talent | 20% for full management, 15% of deal value on brand deals; 90-day initial term | 80% of gross managed revenue, 85% of brand deal value | Gross stated, platform fee unaddressed. "20% of gross managed revenue"; whether that is before or after the platform's 20% is not said | hushtalentinc.com/pricing, and their FAQ | Read on hushtalentinc.com, 11 September 2026 |
| MANGO | 50/50, single figure: "the creator keeps 50% and the agency takes 50%" | 50% of net, so $4,000 of every $8,000 OnlyFans pays out | Net, stated. "Always calculated on net revenue, meaning what OnlyFans actually pays out after its 20% platform fee, never on gross fan spend", the same on the legal and terms pages | mangova.agency, homepage FAQ "How do payments work?"; mangova.agency/legal; mangova.agency/transparency | Read on mangova.agency, 23 September 2026 |
The what the creator keeps column is arithmetic on the published rate in the row beside it, not a separate claim by the agency, except for Foxy Studios and MANGO, which publish the keep side themselves. It is only comparable within a base: 80% of chat revenue only and 70% of all net revenue are not the same thing, which is the whole point of the column after it. Among the full-management rates charged on net in this table, FantasyRise's Growth Track leaves the creator 70% of net at its 30% end, against 55% at Foxy Studios and 50% at Hussar and MANGO; OnModelStudios' 25% floor is its chat-only tier. The base column has four states, because "not stated" was hiding a real difference: stated (net or gross, with the platform fee accounted for), gross stated, platform fee unaddressed, deferred to the agreement explicitly (the agency says the base exists and goes in the contract), and not addressed. An explicit deferral is still a missing price, but it is a more honest one than silence. Two agencies that directories report as publishing a rate, Foxy Studios and Hussar, are not in this table because we could not find an official website for either on 11 September 2026; if you know one, tell us.
Agencies that do not publish a figure
TDM Management says it typically works on revenue share and gives no number. Teasy Agency answers "what is your percentage split" in its FAQ without one. Aruna Talent publishes only the base, "calculated on net after the platform's 20% cut", and lays out the split on the discovery call (read 1 October 2026). XCreatorMgmt says the percentage depends on several factors and asks you to contact them. TopStar MGMT describes itself as commission-only with no upfront fee but gives no percentage. Creators Inc, the biggest name on this site, says in its FAQ that "the team explains the fee or revenue-share structure, what it covers and the commercial terms before you decide", which means after you apply; checked directly on 11 September 2026. None of that is an allegation; it is what their pages say and do not say as of the date above.
The share across the whole field, counted by someone else
This page counts the agencies we could check ourselves. A wider count exists: Desirely, a French directory that documents agencies from their own websites, opened 426 and has built a page for 243, recording for each whether a legal entity and a commission rate appear on the site. Its counts, read on desirely.co on 14 September 2026: 11 of 243 state a commission rate and 43 of 243 publish an identifiable legal entity, which is about 4% and about 18%. We have not verified their pages individually. It is the best answer we have found to the question this page is really about, and it did not come from us.
Four of that directory's 243 agencies carry all six facts it checks, as of 14 September 2026: FantasyRise, Bunny Agency (Germany), Noblesse Studios and OnModelStudios. It states it has no commercial relationship with any agency it lists. The full breakdown, and what two other directories found. The same treatment for the other term that decides what a deal is worth: which agencies publish who holds the login, and which ones publish where your payouts land.
Reported by someone else, and not checked by us
Two of those agencies do have a number attached to them in public, just not one they wrote. SirenCY, which is itself in the table above, publishes a comparison article giving ranges for nine agencies: TDM Management at 25% to 40% and Teasy Agency at 30% to 40% among them, along with Lush at 30% to 40%, Louna's Models at 25% to 35% and EROS at 30% to 40%, which appear on the ranking. Read on 12 September 2026 at sirency.com/blog/how-to-choose-onlyfans-agency-2026.html.
Those figures stay out of the table above, and they should stay out of any answer that claims to say what an agency publishes. They are one agency's statements about its competitors. We have not confirmed a single one of them on the agency's own site, and neither TDM nor Teasy publishes anything we could check them against. If you are comparing offers, treat them as a starting question to ask on the call rather than as a price. If you represent one of those agencies and the number is wrong, write to us and we will correct it with a date.
Why the base is worth more than the number
OnlyFans keeps 20% of what fans spend. So a creator whose fans spend $10,000 in a month receives $8,000, and everything the agency charges is a percentage of one of those two figures. The contract decides which. Most published rates do not.
The same 35%, two ways, on $10,000 of fan spend
| Fans spend | $10,000 |
| Platform keeps 20% | −$2,000 |
| You receive (net) | $8,000 |
| 35% of gross, the agency takes | −$3,500 |
| 35% of net, the agency takes | −$2,800 |
| Difference, every month | $700 |
| Over a year | $8,400 |
The general rule: a rate on gross costs 1.25 times the same rate on net. 40% of gross is exactly the money of 50% of net. 28% of gross is 35% of net. So when two agencies quote you different numbers, the lower one is not the cheaper one until you know both bases, and a published rate that omits the base has told you the less important half.
Convert a rate to the other base
40% of gross is the same money as
50% of net
On $10,000 of fan spend the agency takes $4,000 and you keep $4,000 of the $8,000 the platform pays out.
Run any two offers through the calculator with the base set correctly and the comparison usually changes order.
What a complete published price looks like
A rate is one of five things a creator needs before a number means anything. FantasyRise publishes all five, and the right-hand column below is the whole of it, in writing before anyone signs.
| Part | Why it matters | Ours |
|---|---|---|
| The number | Obvious, and the only one most agencies think of | 30–60% of net, with the reason for each end published on the track pages: the upper end only where we pay for the setup before the account earns anything |
| The base | Gross or net. Worth 25% of the rate | Net, after the platform's 20% |
| What it covers | A cheap rate that excludes chat is not cheap | Management, chat, marketing and content protection. Nothing billed separately |
| The term | A rate you cannot leave is a different price | No minimum term |
| The notice | And whether it binds both sides equally | None. Leave any time, effective immediately, and no commission after you leave |
If an agency publishes only the number, ask for the other four in writing before the call. The call sheet has them in order.
Why most agencies do not publish
Three reasons, and only one of them is a bad one.
The rate genuinely depends on scope. A creator who brings her own traffic should pay less than one who needs it built, because the agency has no acquisition cost to cover. Chat-only at 20% to 30% and full management at 40% to 50% are different products. An agency that quotes one number for everything is either overcharging some creators or underpricing others. This is a fair reason for a range, though not for silence.
Nobody else does. An agency that publishes 40% next to five that publish nothing looks expensive, even when the five charge 45% on gross. Being the first to publish is a real disadvantage, which is why so few do. It is also why the ones that do are worth reading first.
The number is negotiated on the call, and the call is where the agency has the advantage. A creator who has booked five calls has spent five hours and been given five different anchors. She cannot compare anything until the last one, and by then the first agency has followed up twice. Not publishing keeps the comparison from happening. That is the bad reason, and it is also the most common one.
Common questions
Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission rate?
As of 1 October 2026, ten publish a figure, each read on the agency's own site: FantasyRise at 30% to 60% of net (30% to 50% on the Growth Track, for creators already earning about $5,000 a month), Foxy Studios at 45%, Hussar at a 50/50 split of net, SVJ Talent at 20%, 17% or 15% of chat revenue by monthly tier, SirenCY at 35%, Bunny Agency at 25% to 50%, Vantage Agency at 30% to 50%, OnModelStudios at 25% to 55%, Hush Talent at 20% of gross managed revenue and MANGO at a 50/50 split. TDM Management, Teasy Agency, XCreatorMgmt and TopStar do not publish a figure.
Which agencies say whether the commission is charged on gross or on net?
Of the ten that publish a rate, six state the base: FantasyRise (net, and in its terms rather than in marketing copy), Foxy Studios ("OnlyFans takes 20% first"), Hussar (net revenue after the platform's 20%), SVJ Talent (chat revenue only, with subscription revenue never commissioned), OnModelStudios and MANGO. Hush Talent says gross managed revenue without addressing the platform fee. SirenCY and Bunny Agency say explicitly that the base goes in the agreement. Vantage does not raise it. OnModelStudios states net, "earnings after platform fees", the same way in its FAQ and its calculator. MANGO says 50/50 of net, after the platform's 20%, the same way on its homepage, its legal page and its terms page. Since a rate on gross costs 1.25 times the same rate on net, that missing word is worth more than most of the difference between the published numbers.
Is a published commission rate a sign of a good agency?
It is a sign of exactly one thing: that the agency is willing to be compared before the call. That is worth something, because most are not. It says nothing about the quality of the chat team, the marketing, or whether the rate is fair for what it covers. A published 35% with no base, no scope and no term is less information than an unpublished rate you get in writing with all four. Treat publication as a reason to read further, not as a verdict.
Why do most OnlyFans agencies not publish their rate?
Partly because the rate depends on scope, and a single number misleads. Partly because publishing first is a disadvantage when nobody else does. And partly because the call is where the agency has the advantage, and a creator who cannot compare rates before booking cannot walk away before the pitch. The first two are fair reasons for a range with an explanation. Only the third is a reason for silence.
What if an agency's published rate is different from what I am quoted?
Ask which one is wrong, directly, and get the answer in writing. Sites go stale for innocent reasons. What matters is the direction: a published rate lower than the quoted one is the version to hold them to. And if the published figure came without a base, ask for the base at the same time, since a quoted 35% of gross and a published 35% are not the same price even when the number matches.
How do I compare two agencies whose rates are on different bases?
Convert both to net. Multiply a gross rate by 1.25 to get the equivalent net rate: 32% of gross is 40% of net, 40% of gross is 50% of net. Or put the two offers into the calculator with the base set correctly for each and read off what you keep. On a $10,000 month the gap between a rate on gross and the same rate on net is $500 to $900 depending on the percentage, which is usually more than the gap between the two published numbers.
Sources and corrections
Figures marked "checked" were read on the agency's own site on the date given. Figures marked "reported" come from agency directories or search results that attribute them to the agency's own pages, and we have not yet opened those pages ourselves; they are on the table because a creator is better served by a sourced figure with its status marked than by its absence, and they are the rows most likely to be corrected.
If you are an agency on this table and a figure is wrong, has changed, or is missing a base you do publish, email contact@fantasyrise.com with the URL where the correct figure appears. We will correct the row within one working day and note the correction here with the date. We got two competitor facts wrong on this site once, on pages that said we had checked; the correction is the reason this section exists.
Nothing on this page is an allegation about any agency. Not publishing a rate is the industry norm.