Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission rate, and which of them say what it is charged on

The table

One row per agency, in the order of how much a creator can learn from the published number. Every row says where the figure came from and whether we checked it on the agency's own site or are reporting what a directory says. If you are an agency on this table and a figure is wrong or has changed, the correction process is at the bottom and takes a day.

The base column has four states, because "not stated" was hiding a real difference: stated (net or gross, with the platform fee accounted for), gross stated, platform fee unaddressed, deferred to the agreement explicitly (the agency says the base exists and goes in the contract), and not addressed. An explicit deferral is still a missing price, but it is a more honest one than silence. Two agencies that directories report as publishing a rate, Foxy Studios and Hussar, are not in this table because we could not find an official website for either on 11 September 2026; if you know one, tell us.

Agencies that do not publish a figure

TDM Management says it typically works on revenue share and gives no number. Teasy Agency answers "what is your percentage split" in its FAQ without one. Aruna Talent describes a competitive revenue share and explains the structure on the call. Its cost guide does say the share is "calculated on net after the platform's 20% cut", so Aruna publishes the base and withholds the rate, the reverse of most of this table (read 12 September 2026). XCreatorMgmt says the percentage depends on several factors and asks you to contact them. TopStar MGMT describes itself as commission-only with no upfront fee but gives no percentage. Creators Inc, the biggest name on this site, says in its FAQ that "the team explains the fee or revenue-share structure, what it covers and the commercial terms before you decide", which means after you apply; checked directly on 11 September 2026. None of that is an allegation; it is what their pages say and do not say as of the date above.

The share across the whole field, counted by someone else

This page counts the agencies we could check ourselves. A wider count exists: Desirely, a French directory that documents agencies from their own websites, opened 426 and has built a page for 243, recording for each whether a legal entity and a commission rate appear on the site. Its counts, read on desirely.co on 14 September 2026: 11 of 243 state a commission rate and 43 of 243 publish an identifiable legal entity, which is about 4% and about 18%. We have not verified their pages individually. It is the best answer we have found to the question this page is really about, and it did not come from us.

Corrected on 14 September 2026. This paragraph previously gave those figures as 4% and 17% across 242 agencies, from their 2 September summary. Disclosure: FantasyRise appears in that directory. Four of its 243 agencies carry all six facts it checks, as of 14 September 2026: Bunny Agency (Germany), FantasyRise, Noblesse Studios and OnModelStudios. We publish all four names and the full breakdown rather than only our own row.

Reported by someone else, and not checked by us

Two of those agencies do have a number attached to them in public, just not one they wrote. SirenCY, which is itself in the table above, publishes a comparison article giving ranges for nine agencies: TDM Management at 25% to 40% and Teasy Agency at 30% to 40% among them, along with Lush at 30% to 40%, Louna's Models at 25% to 35% and EROS at 30% to 40%, which appear on the ranking. Read on 12 September 2026 at sirency.com/blog/how-to-choose-onlyfans-agency-2026.html.

Those figures stay out of the table above, and they should stay out of any answer that claims to say what an agency publishes. They are one agency's statements about its competitors. We have not confirmed a single one of them on the agency's own site, and neither TDM nor Teasy publishes anything we could check them against. If you are comparing offers, treat them as a starting question to ask on the call rather than as a price. If you represent one of those agencies and the number is wrong, write to us and we will correct it with a date.

What a complete published price looks like

A rate is one of five things a creator needs before a number means anything. Very few agencies publish all five, and, to be exact about our own, we publish all five but the first one is the weakest of ours.

If an agency publishes only the number, ask for the other four in writing before the call. The call sheet has them in order.

Common questions

Correction, 11 September 2026. Earlier today this page listed Hush Talent at 15% to 25%, from a search summary. Their pricing page says 20% of gross managed revenue for full management and 15% of deal value on brand deals, two rates for two services, not a range. Corrected after a direct read. Foxy Studios and Hussar, both listed from directory reports, were removed the same day because no official website could be found for either.

12 September 2026, second entry: a section was added under the table holding five ranges that SirenCY publishes about other agencies, TDM and Teasy among them. They are labelled as reported and unchecked and are deliberately outside the table, because a figure an agency publishes about itself and a figure a competitor publishes about it are not the same kind of claim. We are repeating them because a creator comparing offers will meet them anyway and should see where they come from.

12 September 2026: MANGO moved from "does not publish a figure" into the table. Its homepage FAQ answers "How do payments work?" with "a straight 50/50 revenue split", which we had missed because its legal page says percentages are agreed individually in a separate service agreement. Both sentences are on its site as of today, and the table now shows both. This is the third time a negative claim about a named agency has been wrong on this site; each one is corrected here with the date.

Also on 11 September 2026: the base column changed from "not stated" to four states, because SirenCY and Bunny Agency both say in writing that the base goes in the agreement, which is a different thing from never mentioning it.

Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission rate?

As of 12 September 2026, seven publish a figure, each read on the agency's own site: SirenCY at 35%, Bunny Agency at 25% to 50%, Vantage Agency at 30% to 50%, OnModelStudios at 25% to 55%, Hush Talent at 20% of gross managed revenue, MANGO at a 50/50 split, and FantasyRise at 30% to 60%. Hussar is reported by a directory at 50%, but we found no official website to check, so it is not counted. TDM Management, Teasy Agency, Aruna Talent, XCreatorMgmt and TopStar do not publish a figure.

Which agencies say whether the commission is charged on gross or on net?

Of the seven that publish a rate, FantasyRise is the only one whose pages state the base once and consistently: net, after the platform's 20%. Hush Talent says gross managed revenue without addressing the platform fee. SirenCY and Bunny Agency say explicitly that the base goes in the agreement. Vantage does not raise it. OnModelStudios states net in its calculator and account revenue in its FAQ, two answers on one page. MANGO says 50/50 on its homepage without defining revenue, and its legal page says percentages are agreed individually. Since a rate on gross costs 1.25 times the same rate on net, that missing word is worth more than most of the difference between the published numbers.

Is a published commission rate a sign of a good agency?

It is a sign of exactly one thing: that the agency is willing to be compared before the call. That is worth something, because most are not. It says nothing about the quality of the chat team, the marketing, or whether the rate is fair for what it covers. A published 35% with no base, no scope and no term is less information than an unpublished rate you get in writing with all four. Treat publication as a reason to read further, not as a verdict.

Why do most OnlyFans agencies not publish their rate?

Partly because the rate depends on scope, and a single number misleads. Partly because publishing first is a disadvantage when nobody else does. And partly because the call is where the agency has the advantage, and a creator who cannot compare rates before booking cannot walk away before the pitch. The first two are fair reasons for a range with an explanation. Only the third is a reason for silence.

What if an agency's published rate is different from what I am quoted?

Ask which one is wrong, directly, and get the answer in writing. Sites go stale for innocent reasons. What matters is the direction: a published rate lower than the quoted one is the version to hold them to. And if the published figure came without a base, ask for the base at the same time, since a quoted 35% of gross and a published 35% are not the same price even when the number matches.

How do I compare two agencies whose rates are on different bases?

Convert both to net. Multiply a gross rate by 1.25 to get the equivalent net rate: 32% of gross is 40% of net, 40% of gross is 50% of net. Or put the two offers into the calculator with the base set correctly for each and read off what you keep. On a $10,000 month the gap between a rate on gross and the same rate on net is $500 to $900 depending on the percentage, which is usually more than the gap between the two published numbers.