Every number on this site is published. 30–60% of net · no notice period, leave any time · $0 before your first payout. The six commitments
Agency comparison

How we compare

Eight agencies, the same six questions, and a column that says "not published" wherever that is the honest answer. Including the places where the other one wins.

Short answer

Five of the eight publish a commission figure, and only one says, once and consistently, what the percentage is charged on. OnModelStudios says net in its calculator and "account revenue" in its FAQ. That second gap is the expensive one: on $10,000 of gross earnings, the same 40% is $800 a month apart depending on whether it comes off before or after the platform's 20%. Ours is 30% to 60% of net, published, which is the only reason we can be compared on it.

Everything most creators want to know is in the individual contract, not on any website. Notice periods, who holds the login, what happens to content at the end, whether commission keeps running after you leave: for six of the eight, almost none of that is public. That is the industry norm rather than an accusation, and it is why the table below has so many blank-looking cells.

Where each of them beats us is named on its own page, because a comparison written by one of the parties is worth nothing otherwise. Bunny is bigger and multi-platform. TDM runs chat in-house from its own office. Aruna sells content protection standalone. SirenCY publishes far more than we do. Teasy offers OFTV and Fanvue as named services. Vantage takes nothing upfront and turns away creators already under contract elsewhere. Creators Inc has a named CEO, national press and a content house in Los Angeles, and publishes nothing about price, login or legal entity. OnModelStudios publishes nearly everything, with a four-hour reply promise we do not match.

Disclosure, up front: FantasyRise wrote this and is one of the agencies on it. Nobody paid to be included, moved up, or left off, and we earn nothing if you go elsewhere. Every statement about another agency comes from its own public pages, checked on the date in the table's last column. The rules we hold ourselves to are on the methodology page.

Which agency fits which creator, in one line each

Read from the eight agencies' own pages and from our own. Each line is where that agency is the stronger choice, not a ranking.

  • FantasyRise: a creator who wants every term published before the call, her login and payouts in her own hands, and a small roster; not a creator who wants ten platforms or a large team.
  • Bunny Agency: a creator who wants genuine multi-platform coverage from a large operation with a published rate and a named managing director.
  • TDM Management: a creator whose first question is chat quality and who accepts that the team logs into the account directly.
  • Aruna Talent: a creator who wants content protection as a standalone product without management.
  • SirenCY: a creator who wants a large published body of guidance and a single stated rate, with the basis defined in the agreement.
  • Teasy Agency: a creator who wants OFTV or Fanvue management as named services.
  • Vantage Agency: a creator who values a lower published ceiling and a policy of refusing anyone still under exclusive contract elsewhere.
  • Creators Inc: a creator who wants the largest machine, a named CEO and a content house, and is willing to learn the terms after applying.
  • OnModelStudios: a creator who wants the closest published terms to ours plus a four-hour reply promise, and can live with a commission base stated two ways.

Three kinds of statement appear on this site's comparison pages, and they are kept apart: what an agency states on its own pages ("their site says"), what an outside source reports about it ("reported by", with the source and date), and what FantasyRise concludes from either. The table below uses only the first kind; the 23-agency ranking marks the second kind wherever it appears.

The six questions, across all eight agencies

The last column counts how many of the five an agency answers on its own site. A cell with two contradicting answers does not count. It measures disclosure, not performance: an agency at 1 of 5 may run accounts superbly, you just cannot tell from outside. "Not published" means we could not find it on the agency's own public pages on 10 September 2026. In most cases the answer exists in the individual contract, which is exactly the point: you cannot compare it before you are already in a conversation.

AgencyCommissionOn gross or netMinimum termLogin stays with the creatorNamed entity and addressPublished, of 5Source, last checked
FantasyRise30–60%, publishedOf net, statedNone, and no notice periodYes, alwaysYes, full record5 of 5This site, 12 Sep 2026
Bunny Agency25–50%, publishedDeferred to the agreement, explicitlyNone, statedNot publishedYes, full record3 of 5bunny-agency.com, own pages, 10 Sep 2026
Vantage Agency30–50%, publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot published1 of 5thevantage.agency, own page, 10 Sep 2026
SirenCY35%, publishedDeferred to the agreement, explicitlyNot publishedNot publishedYes, register number2 of 5sirency.com, own pages and cost guide, 12 Sep 2026
TDM ManagementNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedTeam logs in directlyYes, register number2 of 5TDM's own site, 11 Sep 2026; unreachable for a re-read on 12 Sep
Teasy AgencyNot publishedNot publishedShorter than typical, no figureNot publishedNot published1 of 5teasyagency.com, own pages, 12 Sep 2026
Aruna TalentNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedEntity only, no address1 of 5arunatalent.com, own pages and cost guide, 12 Sep 2026
Creators IncNot published, terms after applicationNot publishedNot publishedNot published. "Access" discussed before work beginsNo entity or address; LA and Miami named0 of 5creatorsinc.com, own pages and chat assistant, 11 Sep 2026
OnModelStudios25–55% in FAQ, calculator caps at 50%Net per calculator, "account revenue" per FAQ"No long-term lock-in", no figureYes, statedYes, full record4 of 5. The base is published twice, differently, so that cell does not countonmodelstudios.com, own page, 10 Sep 2026

Why the second column is worth more than the first

Fans paid$10,000
Platform fee, 20%−$2,000
Net after the platform$8,000
40% of net−$3,200
You keep$4,800
40% of gross−$4,000
You keep$4,000

Same headline percentage, $800 a month apart, $9,600 over a year. A published rate with no stated basis is half a price. The calculator runs it on your numbers, and this page checks which basis you are actually being charged.

The eight, one by one

Each of these has a full page. What follows is the shortest honest version, including the reason to pick them over us.

Scale vs Bunny Agency Publishes 25–50%, a Wyoming entity and a named managing director. Built for breadth across ten or more platforms with a 112 person team. If you want genuine multi-platform coverage, they are better equipped than we are. Chat vs TDM Management Their central claim is an in-house chat team working from their own office rather than outsourced freelancers. That is specific and checkable, and most agencies cannot match it. Their team logs into creator accounts directly. Protection vs Aruna Talent Sells content protection as a standalone product you can buy without management, and operates at much larger scale. If protection is all you want, that is them and not us. Reach vs SirenCY Well over a hundred published pages against our fifty, which is the main reason a creator searching for an agency finds them and not us. They publish a single rate, 35%, without saying what it is charged on. Platforms vs Teasy Agency Offers OFTV management and Fanvue management as named services with their own pages, which we do not, and one founder describes running her own page since 2017. Discretion vs Vantage Agency Publishes 30–50% and takes nothing upfront, so their ceiling is below ours. They also refuse creators still under exclusive contract elsewhere, which costs them signings and is the right policy. Size vs Creators Inc A named CEO with national press, teams in Los Angeles and Miami, a content house, and by their own figure $2 billion in creator sales. If you want the machine, it is them. They publish no price, no login policy and no legal entity. Disclosure vs OnModelStudios The closest to us on published terms: your login, direct payouts, no lock-in, no upfront fees, 24/7 chat, a four-hour reply promise and a Florida LLC with a street address. Their commission is published twice, with a different base each time.

What a table like this cannot tell you

We would rather set the limits of this page than have you find them.

  • Published terms are not delivered work. Everything here measures what an agency is willing to put in public before a call. That correlates with how a company behaves, but it is not the same thing, and an agency that publishes nothing may still run your account superbly.
  • We chose the criteria. They are the six questions we tell creators to ask everyone, and we pass all six, which is not a coincidence. An agency that led on chat quality or on roster results would pick a different six and would win on those.
  • Half the industry is missing. These are the eight with enough public material to compare. The wider list is here, and most of it publishes even less.
  • None of this is a performance ranking. Nothing on this page measures earnings, retention or how anyone was treated. It measures disclosure.

The useful way to read it: not as a scoreboard, but as a list of what you will have to ask on the call, because the website will not answer it. That list is here, with the answers that should worry you.

Common questions

Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission?

Of the eight compared here, five: SirenCY at 35%, FantasyRise at 30% to 60%, Bunny Agency at 25% to 50%, Vantage Agency at 30% to 50%, and OnModelStudios at 25% to 55%. TDM, Teasy, Aruna and Creators Inc do not publish a figure. Only FantasyRise states what the percentage is charged on once and consistently; OnModelStudios says net in its calculator and account revenue in its FAQ. The basis matters more than the percentage itself: five published numbers, one consistent published basis. The full table, with a source and date for every agency, is on the published commission page.

Is a lower published commission the better deal?

Not on its own. A rate quoted without saying whether it is charged on gross or on net is half a price, and the difference is $800 a month on $10,000 of gross earnings at a 40% rate. A lower rate charged on gross can cost more than a higher rate charged on net. Get the basis in writing before comparing any two numbers.

Why do so many cells say "not published"?

Because the answers live in the individual contract, which is the industry norm rather than a scandal. It does mean a creator cannot compare agencies until she has booked calls with all of them, and the agency is the party that benefits from that. It is the reason this site publishes its own terms instead.

Can I trust a comparison written by one of the agencies in it?

Only as far as you can check it, which is why every statement here comes from the other agency's own public pages and why each full page names what that agency does better than we do. Read it as a starting point and verify the parts that matter to you. If you represent an agency here and something is wrong, we correct it and note the date.

What if the agency I am looking at is not on this list?

Apply the same six questions yourself. The process for checking an agency that nobody has written about is on the verification page, and it works on any name, including ours.

Sources and corrections

Every statement about another agency comes from that agency's own public pages, checked on 10 September 2026, with the find recorded alongside it. We do not carry figures over from other comparison articles, and where an agency does not publish something we write that rather than estimating. Nothing here is an allegation about anyone.

If you represent an agency on this page and something is inaccurate or out of date, email contact@fantasyrise.com and we will correct it, including when the correction makes you look better than us. Corrections that change the substance are noted with a date on the page they affect.