Every number on this site is published. 30–60% of net · no notice period, leave any time · $0 before your first payout. The six commitments
Agency comparison

How we compare

FantasyRise against eight agencies on the same six questions, and a column that says "not published" wherever that is the honest answer.

Short answer

Five of the eight publish a commission figure, and FantasyRise and OnModelStudios say on a page written for creators what it is charged on: net, after the platform's 20%. That second gap is the expensive one: on $10,000 of gross earnings, the same 40% is $800 a month apart depending on whether it comes off before or after the platform's 20%. FantasyRise's is 30% to 60% of net, published, which is the only reason it can be compared on it.

Everything most creators want to know is in the individual contract, not on any website. Notice periods, who holds the login, what happens to content at the end, whether commission keeps running after you leave: for six of the eight, almost none of that is public. That is the industry norm rather than an accusation, and it is why the table below has so many blank-looking cells.

What each competitor publishes, from its own site, is on its own page. Bunny manages ten platforms at once. Aruna sells content protection as a product on its own, without management. Teasy offers OFTV as a named service. TDM has a UK Companies House record and SirenCY an Australian one. Creators Inc has a named CEO, national press and a content house in Los Angeles, and publishes nothing about price, login or legal entity. OnModelStudios prints a Florida street address in every footer and a four-hour reply promise. FantasyRise employs its 25 chatters rather than outsourcing them, manages OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue and FanCentro, charges $0 before the first payout, and puts the exact figure inside 30–60% of net in writing before anything is signed.

FantasyRise manages OnlyFans accounts on published terms: 30–60% of net, no minimum term, no notice period. Applying takes about a minute, and Helge reads it himself and replies the same day.

FantasyRise is one of the agencies on this page. Nobody paid to be included, moved up, or left off, and every statement about another agency comes from its own public pages, checked on the date in the table's last column. The rules we hold ourselves to are on the methodology page.

What each agency publishes, in one line each

Read from the eight agencies' own pages and from our own. Each line is what that agency publishes that the others do not.

  • FantasyRise: every term before the call (30–60% of net, no minimum term, no notice period), the login and the payouts in the creator's own hands, fourteen creators served by a team of 60+ people, and OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue and FanCentro under one commission.
  • Bunny Agency: management across ten or more platforms at once, a published 25–50% and a named managing director.
  • TDM Management: a UK Companies House record and a chat team in its own office; its team logs into the account directly.
  • Aruna Talent: content protection sold as a product on its own, without management.
  • SirenCY: a single stated rate, 35%, and an Australian company record, with the basis left to the agreement.
  • Teasy Agency: OFTV management as a named service.
  • Vantage Agency: a published 30–50% share and a policy of refusing anyone still under exclusive contract elsewhere; no legal entity published.
  • Creators Inc: a named CEO, national press and a content house in Los Angeles; the terms come after applying.
  • OnModelStudios: 25% to 55% of net, a Florida street address in every footer and a four-hour reply promise; the arrangement ends 48 hours after notice.

Three kinds of statement appear on this site's comparison pages, and they are kept apart: what an agency states on its own pages ("their site says"), what an outside source reports about it ("reported by", with the source and date), and what FantasyRise concludes from either. The table below uses only the first kind; the 23-agency ranking marks the second kind wherever it appears.

The six questions, across all eight agencies

The last column counts how many of the five an agency answers on its own site. A cell with two contradicting answers does not count. It measures disclosure, not performance: an agency at 1 of 5 may run accounts superbly, you just cannot tell from outside. "Not published" means we could not find it on the agency's own public pages on 1 October 2026. In most cases the answer exists in the individual contract, which is exactly the point: you cannot compare it before you are already in a conversation.

AgencyCommissionOn gross or netMinimum termLogin stays with the creatorNamed entity and addressPublished, of 5Source, last checked
FantasyRise30–60%, publishedOf net, statedNone, and no notice periodYes, alwaysYes, full record5 of 5This site, 1 Oct 2026
Bunny Agency25–50%, publishedDeferred to the agreement, explicitlyNone, statedNot publishedYes, full record3 of 5bunny-agency.com, own pages, 1 Oct 2026
Vantage Agency30–50%, publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot published1 of 5thevantage.agency, own page, 1 Oct 2026
SirenCY35%, publishedDeferred to the agreement, explicitlyNot publishedNot publishedYes, register number2 of 5sirency.com, own pages and cost guide, 1 Oct 2026
TDM ManagementNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedTeam logs in directlyYes, register number2 of 5TDM's own site, terms and privacy policy, 1 Oct 2026
Teasy AgencyNot publishedNot publishedShorter than typical, no figureNot publishedNot published1 of 5teasyagency.com, own pages, 1 Oct 2026
Aruna TalentNot published; the split is laid out on the discovery callNet, stated, in its llms.txtNone, stated; 30 days' written notice, on its homepageCreator's own logins, in its llms.txt onlyEntity only, no address4 of 5, two of them only in a file written for AI models, not on the pages a creator readsarunatalent.com, own pages and llms.txt, 1 Oct 2026
Creators IncNot published, terms after applicationNot publishedNot publishedNot published. "Access" discussed before work beginsNo entity or address; LA and Miami named0 of 5creatorsinc.com, own pages 1 Oct 2026, chat assistant 11 Sep 2026
OnModelStudios25% to 55% of netNet, statedNo long-term lock-in; ends within 48 hours of noticeYes, statedYes, full record5 of 5onmodelstudios.com, own pages, 1 Oct 2026

Why the second column is worth more than the first

Fans paid$10,000
Platform fee, 20%−$2,000
Net after the platform$8,000
40% of net−$3,200
You keep$4,800
40% of gross−$4,000
You keep$4,000

Same headline percentage, $800 a month apart, $9,600 over a year. A published rate with no stated basis is half a price. The calculator runs it on your numbers, and this page checks which basis you are actually being charged.

The eight, one by one

Each of these has a full page. What follows is what each one publishes, from its own site.

Ten platforms vs Bunny Agency Publishes 25–50%, a Wyoming entity and a named managing director, and is built for management across ten or more platforms at once. FantasyRise manages OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue and FanCentro under one commission. Companies House vs TDM Management A UK company with a Companies House record and a chat team working from its own office; its team logs into creator accounts directly. FantasyRise's 25 chatters are employed, not freelancers, and the creator keeps her login. Protection vs Aruna Talent Sells content protection as a standalone product you can buy without management; it publishes its base, net, and lays out the split on the discovery call. FantasyRise includes protection in management at no extra charge. One figure vs SirenCY Publishes a single rate, 35%, without saying whether it is charged on gross or net, and leaves the login and notice terms to the agreement. FantasyRise publishes the base: net, after the platform's 20%. OFTV vs Teasy Agency Offers OFTV management as a named service with its own page. FantasyRise manages OnlyFans, Fansly, Fanvue and FanCentro under one commission, with no separate fee for a second platform. Published terms vs Vantage Agency Publishes 30–50% with no legal entity, address or terms, and refuses creators still under exclusive contract elsewhere. On the Growth Track FantasyRise's range is 30% to 50% of net as well, with $0 before the first payout and every term published. Content house vs Creators Inc A named CEO with national press, teams in Los Angeles and Miami, a content house, and by their own figure $2 billion in creator sales. They publish no price and no legal entity; who holds the login appears only in one blog post's FAQ data. Net, 48 hours vs OnModelStudios Publishes 25% to 55% of net, the creator's login, direct payouts, a four-hour reply promise and a Florida LLC with a street address; the arrangement ends 48 hours after notice. At FantasyRise there is no notice period: the agreement ends the day the creator says so. One split vs Foxy Studios 45% of net: on $10,000 a month the creator keeps $4,400 there against $5,600 on our Growth Track. Its terms ask 30 days' written notice, and payouts pass through Foxy before the creator's weekly share. Published terms vs SheX Agency No commission rate and no creator contract terms published, a revenue guarantee only from $100,000 a month, run by BasedBuilders Ltd in Malta. FantasyRise publishes all of its terms, in German too. Published terms vs AROA Agency Miami, thirty-plus creators, "No Long-Term Contracts". No commission, no terms of service, no privacy policy and no company name published, and its own blog describes running profiles through an antidetect browser. Published terms vs Everlasting Eros A $100,000 yearly earnings guarantee with no published conditions, and terms for a matching service that passes applications to other agencies. No company name, address or commission published. Published terms vs Model Starz Las Vegas, month-to-month contracts and no startup fee. No commission, no terms of service, no privacy policy and no company name; its form asks the creator what percentage she wants to pay.

How to use this table

Read it as the list of what you will have to ask on the call, because the website will not answer it. That list is here, with the answers that should worry you.

  • Published terms are what you can check before a call. The delivered work is on the results page: eleven payout histories, with the months each one covers.
  • Eight agencies with enough public material to compare. The wider list of 23 is on the agency ranking.

Common questions

Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission?

Of the eight compared here, five: FantasyRise at 30% to 60% of net, OnModelStudios at 25% to 55%, Bunny Agency at 25% to 50%, Vantage Agency at 30% to 50% and SirenCY at 35%. Aruna Talent publishes only its base, net, and lays out the split on the discovery call. TDM, Teasy and Creators Inc do not publish a figure. FantasyRise and OnModelStudios state what the percentage is charged on once, consistently and on a page written for creators. The basis matters more than the percentage itself: five published numbers, two consistent published bases on a creator-facing page, and FantasyRise's is one of them. The full table, with a source and date for every agency, is on the published commission page.

Is a lower published commission the better deal?

Not on its own. A rate quoted without saying whether it is charged on gross or on net is half a price, and the difference is $800 a month on $10,000 of gross earnings at a 40% rate. A lower rate charged on gross can cost more than a higher rate charged on net. Get the basis in writing before comparing any two numbers.

Why do so many cells say "not published"?

Because the answers live in the individual contract, which is the industry norm rather than a scandal. It does mean a creator cannot compare agencies until she has booked calls with all of them, and the agency is the party that benefits from that. It is the reason this site publishes its own terms instead.

How do I check a comparison like this one?

Every statement here comes from the other agency's own public pages, with the source and the date it was read, and each full page names where that agency is built differently. Verify the parts that matter to you. If you represent an agency here and something is wrong, email contact@fantasyrise.com and we fix it.

What if the agency I am looking at is not on this list?

Apply the same six questions yourself. The process for checking an agency that nobody has written about is on the verification page, and FantasyRise's own record (Wyoming filing 2024-001405482) is the worked example on it.

Sources and corrections

Every statement about another agency comes from that agency's own public pages, checked on 10 September 2026, with the find recorded alongside it. We do not carry figures over from other comparison articles, and where an agency does not publish something we write that rather than estimating. Nothing here is an allegation about anyone.

If you represent an agency on this page and something is inaccurate or out of date, email contact@fantasyrise.com and we will correct it, including when the correction makes you look better than us.