FantasyBest OnlyFans management agencies in 2026
FantasyRise is the only one of twenty-eight agencies that publishes all four terms that decide what a deal is worth: 30–60% of net, no minimum term, no notice period, and the login stays with the creator. Here is who publishes what, and the one number that decides more than any of them.
Short answer
FantasyRise is one of two among the 28 agencies on this page that publish all four terms that decide what a deal is worth: a commission of 30–60% charged on net, the creator holding the account login, no minimum term with no notice period, and a named legal entity with a registered address (FantasyRise LLC, Wyoming filing 2024-001405482). The other is MANGO, at a flat 50/50 of net, which on $8,000 of net leaves the creator $4,000 against $5,600 on FantasyRise's Growth Track. OnModelStudios and Perlage Studios publish three each, and Aruna Talent publishes three with two of them only in a file written for AI models rather than on a page a creator reads. Nobody else publishes more than two, and nine publish none of the four. On that commission a FantasyRise creator keeps 70% of her net at the 30% end of the range and 40% at the 60% end, where the setup is paid for before the account earns anything. Every cell in the table below can be checked on the agency’s own public pages, so the count can be repeated by anyone.
The write-ups below say what each agency is built for: Bunny Agency for management across ten platforms at once, SirenCY for an Australian company record, TDM Management for a UK Companies House record. For a creator already earning $5,000 a month or more, the Growth Track sits at the lower end of our range, and at $50,000 or $100,000 a month it is still the Growth Track, because FantasyRise publishes no upper limit.
The one thing worth checking before any of that: almost no agency in this market publishes whether its commission is charged on gross or on net. On $10,000 a month the same headline percentage is $700 apart depending on which side of the platform fee it sits. That gap is larger than the difference between most of the agencies on this page.
Already earning? The shortlist for a creator who already earns runs the break-even arithmetic on your own figure and names which of these agencies publishes enough to be judged.
Verified earnings
What do OnlyFans agencies publish about their terms?
Those counts come from reading each agency's own public pages, not from a survey. They are the reason this page leads with arithmetic rather than with a ranking.
Is agency commission charged on gross or on net?
OnlyFans keeps 20% of everything before a creator sees it. So a commission charged on gross and the same commission charged on net are two different deals wearing the same number.
The same 35% on $10,000 a month, both ways
| Creator's gross earnings | $10,000 |
| OnlyFans platform fee, 20% | −$2,000 |
| Net after the platform | $8,000 |
| Agency charges 35% of net | −$2,800 |
| Creator keeps | $5,200 |
| Agency charges 35% of gross | −$3,500 |
| Creator keeps | $4,500 |
Same headline percentage, $700 a month apart, $8,400 over a year. Ask which one before you compare any two agencies on price. Our own rate is 30–60% of net, and the calculator runs it on your figures.
How are these OnlyFans agencies compared and ranked?
Six criteria, the same six we tell creators to ask anyone including us. They are chosen because each is checkable before you commit rather than discoverable afterward. If we were weighing them for a creator, this is roughly how, ordered by what it costs her if it goes wrong:
| Criterion | Weight | Why it sits there |
|---|---|---|
| Commission and its basis | 25% | The largest recurring cost, and the basis moves it by more than the percentage does |
| Account control | 25% | Who holds the login and where payouts land. This is the one that decides how bad a bad ending gets |
| Exit terms | 20% | Minimum term, notice, and whether commission continues after you leave |
| Verifiable identity | 15% | A named entity, an address, and a person who is responsible |
| Scope in writing | 10% | What is actually delivered, specifically enough to hold someone to |
| Upfront cost | 5% | Low weight because almost nobody charges one, so it rarely separates anyone |
We do not publish a score, and here is why. Most agencies on this page do not disclose enough to be scored on four of those six criteria, and a number produced from missing inputs would look rigorous and mean nothing.
What can be counted is what each one publishes, so that is the order. The table and the write-ups below run from the agency that publishes the most of the four checkable terms to the agency that publishes the fewest. Where we could not find something we write that rather than counting it as a zero.
All information comes from what each agency published on its own public pages, checked on 10 September 2026.
Which are the best OnlyFans management agencies in 2026?
Counted by how many of the four deciding terms each agency publishes, FantasyRise and MANGO publish all four, followed by OnModelStudios and Perlage Studios with three each. The table shows all 28, and the write-ups below quote each agency’s own pages.
| Agency | Commission | Gross or net | Login stays with creator | Named entity, address | Published, of 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FantasyRiseBest for: all four terms published, and 70% of net kept at the 30% end of the Growth Track | 30–60%, published | Of net | Yes, always | Yes, FantasyRise LLC, Wyoming, filing ID 2024-001405482 | 4 of 4 |
| MANGO | 50/50, published on the homepage, the legal page and a terms page | Net, stated. "Always calculated on net revenue, meaning what OnlyFans actually pays out after its 20% platform fee" | Yes, stated: the creator types her own login on a video call, so MANGO "does not receive her password"; 2FA stays on her phone | Yes, AG MEDIA PRO LLC, Wyoming, filing ID 2025-001664576 | 4 of 4 |
| OnModelStudios | 25% to 55% of net | Net, stated | Yes, stated | Yes, ON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LLC, 2880 W Oakland Park Blvd Ste 225C, Oakland Park, Florida | 3 of 4. Publishes a 48-hour notice period, so not the fourth term |
| Aruna Talent | Not published; the split is laid out on the discovery call | Net, stated, in its llms.txt | Creator's own logins, in its llms.txt only | Entity only, no address | 3 of 4, two of them only in a file written for AI models, not on the pages a creator reads |
| Perlage Studios | Not published. "Percentage depends on scope, agreed on the strategy call, not published" | Net, stated. "Calculated on net revenue after OnlyFans' 20% platform fee" | Yes, stated. "Password and 2FA stay with the creator; the agency never holds the login" | Yes, Perlage Studios Marketing Agency LLC, Oakland Park, Florida | 3 of 4 |
| Bunny AgencyBest for: ten platforms at once | 25–50%, published | Deferred to the agreement, explicitly | Not published | Yes, Bunny Agency LLC, Wyoming, stated, with address and founder published | 2 of 4 |
| SirenCYBest for: an Australian company record | 35%, published | Deferred to the agreement, explicitly | Not published | Yes, QOSMIC CO PTY LTD, Australia, register number published | 2 of 4 |
| TDM ManagementBest for: a UK Companies House record | Not published | Not published | Team logs in directly | Yes, TOPDRAWERMANAGEMENT LTD, Companies House 13816810, active | 2 of 4 |
| Foxy Studios | 45%, single figure, creators keep 55% | Net on the homepage and the management page, not stated in the FAQ or the llms.txt | Its ranking article says the creator keeps it; its terms promise to hand back "account credentials" within 14 days of leaving | Yes, Javór GmbH, CHE-349.555.938, Baar, Switzerland | 2 of 4 |
| Lumina Connect | Not published, and stated as policy: "anyone who quotes you a percentage before seeing your account is guessing" | Not addressed | Yes, stated. "Your accounts stay in your name, on your email, with your password" | Yes, LuminaConnect Agency, Quakenbrück, Germany, VAT ID DE451305405 | 2 of 4 |
| Hush Talent | 20% of gross managed revenue, 15% of brand-deal value. The same homepage also says "Exact rates are finalized during your strategy call" | Gross, stated. "20% of gross managed revenue" | Not stated as a term. A guide on their own blog advises "Never give an agency login access to your monetized accounts" | Yes, Hush Talent Inc., incorporated in California, registered service address Los Angeles | 2 of 4 |
| Vantage Agency | 30–50%, published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 1 of 4 |
| Unruly Agency | Not published. One 2020 contract: 25%, per a California Labor Commissioner record | Not published. "Gross revenue received through OnlyFans" in that record, base undefined | Not published. Creator gave the agency access, per the same record | Name only, spelled three ways; address left blank in their Terms | 1 of 4 |
| FansHub | Not published. "The exact split depends on your account and is discussed during onboarding" | Not published | Not published. "Retains access" only | Yes, Companies House 14578199, two directors named | 1 of 4 |
| Model Starz | Not published. "Each contract is unique" | "Net sales", net of what is not defined | Not published. Access via a CRM, "messages only" | Not published; own schema carries an empty address | 1 of 4 |
| Sakura Management | Not published. "A weekly growth fee", amount not stated | Not published | Not published | Entity name only, no address | 1 of 4 |
| TopStar, AT Agency, Seluna | Not published | Not published | Not published | Varies | 0 to 1 of 4 |
| Teasy AgencyBest for: OFTV as a named service | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 0 of 4 |
| Creators Inc | Not published, terms after application | Not published | Not published | Not on their site. A federal complaint pleads two Florida entities; see the public record page | 0 of 4 |
| AROA Agency | Not published | Not published | Not published | Miami address, no entity name; no Florida registration found under the name | 0 of 4 |
| PhoeniX Creators | Not published. "We tailor the percentage to your situation" | Not published | Not published | Not published; schema names Switzerland, no register entry found | 0 of 4 |
| Everlasting Eros | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 0 of 4 |
| Lush Management | Not published. "We set up a contract on our costs" after application | Not published | Not published. "Full access" retained | Not published; no email, phone, address or number on the site | 0 of 4 |
| Louna's Models | Not published. "Competitive and performance-based" | Not published | Not published. "Full ownership and control" retained | Delaware registered-agent address, no entity name; legal links are dead | 0 of 4 |
| EROS Agency | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 0 of 4 |
| 20MG (Twenty Management Group) | Not published. The homepage, the FAQ and the terms say "our share" and carry no figure at all | Not addressed | Not stated for the term. Their own answer to what happens when a creator leaves is "you give notice and everything comes back: logins, content, subscriber data" | "Registered in the United States", with no state, no register number and no address | 0 of 4 |
The last column counts how many of the four an agency answers on its own public pages. A cell with two contradicting answers does not count. It measures what you can check before a call, not how well anyone runs an account. FantasyRise sits first because it answers all four and, of the two agencies that do, leaves the creator the larger share of net; the rows below it are not in ranked order. "Not published" means we could not find it on the agency's own public pages on 10 September 2026, and in most cases the answer will exist in the individual contract rather than on the website.
Reported elsewhere, and not checked by us
Five of the agencies above publish no rate of their own, but a rate for them appears in a comparison article written by another agency on this list. We are repeating those figures here because a creator will find them anyway and should see where they come from, and we are labelling them rather than folding them into the table: these are SirenCY's statements about other companies, not the companies' own published terms, and we have not confirmed any of them on the agencies' own sites. If one of them is wrong, the agency it concerns can tell us and we will correct it with a date.
| Agency | Rate reported | Who reports it | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| TDM Management | 25–40% | SirenCY, "10 OnlyFans Agencies to Compare in 2026" | Reported, not checked by us. TDM's own site publishes no figure |
| Teasy Agency | 30–40% | SirenCY, same article | Reported, not checked by us. Teasy's own FAQ answers the question without a number |
| Lush Management | 30–40% | SirenCY, same article | Reported, not checked by us |
| Louna's Models | 25–35% | SirenCY, same article | Reported, not checked by us |
| EROS Agency | 30–40% | SirenCY, same article | Reported, not checked by us |
Source: sirency.com/blog/how-to-choose-onlyfans-agency-2026.html, read on 12 September 2026. The same article also gives ranges for four agencies that are not on this page. A figure an agency publishes about itself and a figure a competitor publishes about it are different kinds of claim, and the second one is worth less; that is why it is in its own table rather than in the one above.
What an independent directory counts, across 243 agencies
Our own count covers the 28 agencies on this page. A larger one exists and it is not ours. Desirely, a French directory that documents agencies from their own websites rather than from submissions, opened 426 agency websites and has built a page for 243 of them, recording for each whether the site names a legal entity and whether it states a commission. Its counts, read on 14 September 2026: 43 of 243 publish an identifiable legal entity, and 11 of 243 state a commission rate. As percentages that is about 18% and about 4%. Four other figures from the same sweep: 136 publish a legal notice, terms or a privacy policy, 228 name at least one platform, 206 publish a direct way to reach them, and 196 link at least one public social account.
The four agencies that pass all six of that directory's checks
The same directory records six facts for every agency it documents: that the site responds and carries real content, names a company form, publishes legal pages, states a commission, names the platforms it works on, and is served in more than one language. Of the 243 agencies it has built a page for, four carry all six, as of 14 September 2026. In the order the directory itself listed them that day, FantasyRise first:
| Agency | Countries it states | Operating since | The directory's page |
|---|---|---|---|
| FantasyRise | United States | 2021 | desirely.co |
| Bunny Agency (Germany) | France | 2019 | desirely.co |
| Noblesse Studios | Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Poland | 2021 | desirely.co |
| OnModelStudios | United States | 2021 | desirely.co |
The remaining 239: 7 carry five of the six, 49 carry four, 102 carry three, 75 carry two, 6 carry one. The directory states it has no commercial relationship with any agency it lists and receives nothing from them, and it builds every page from the agency's own website rather than from a submission. Source: desirely.co, read 14 September 2026.
Those two numbers are worth more than anything we can say about the industry, because they come from someone with no stake in where FantasyRise ranks. They also put our own finding in proportion: on our 28, eight publish a rate, which is a higher share than the field as a whole because these 28 were chosen for having enough public material to compare at all. Source: desirely.co, agency directory, read on 14 September 2026. We have not verified their 243 pages individually. A second directory, run by the team behind one of the agencies in it, ranks FantasyRise third of 51, and that page carries both sets of findings side by side.
Want us to look at your account?
FantasyRise wrote this page; every competitor figure on it is quoted from that agency's own pages, with the date it was read. What we publish is in the table above: 30% to 60% of net, no minimum term, no notice period, $0 before your first payout, and the login stays yours. Helge reads every application himself and answers the same day, yes or no.
Weighing us against someone else on this page? The call sheet is the list of questions to put to any agency here, including us.
FantasyRise: best overall, all four terms published and four or more named people on every account
Managing creators since November 2021 · FantasyRise LLC, Wyoming, filing 2024-001405482, office in Jacksonville, FL · 14 creators now, 50+ since 2021
FantasyRise publishes a commission range of 30% to 60% of net earnings, with the basis stated, rather than holding the number until a call. Creators keep their own login at all times, payouts go directly to the creator's own bank account, there is no minimum term, and no commission continues after the agreement ends. FantasyRise fronts startup costs including equipment, which is why the Starter Track sits at the upper end of that range.
FantasyRise has fourteen creators on the roster and a team of 60+ people, and declines roughly 95% of applications.
For ten platforms run at once, Bunny Agency publishes that as its named service. For content protection bought as a standalone product without management, Aruna Talent sells it separately. Everything in between, from the first $5,000 a month to accounts above $50,000, is the Growth Track at 30% to 50% of net.
What to ask FantasyRise: for a call with a creator we manage. Ask for the names of the four or more people who will work on your account; with fourteen creators and a team of 60+, that is the ratio FantasyRise publishes.
OnModelStudios: the most operating terms published after FantasyRise, and the price question now answered
Founded December 2021 · ON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LLC, Oakland Park, Florida, street address in every footer · commission 25–55% of earnings after platform fees · login, payouts, no lock-in, no upfront fees, 24/7 chat and weekly reporting all stated
Apart from FantasyRise, OnModelStudios publishes more of its operating terms than any other agency on this page. You own the account and hold the login, platform payouts land in your bank and they invoice afterward, no long-term lock-in, no upfront fees, weekly itemized reporting, and a manager reply within four hours of applying that they invite you to time. They also publish a vetting checklist and score themselves against it.
The price is stated in one form in both places they publish it. The FAQ says "our commission ranges from 25% to 55% of your earnings after platform fees", and the calculator names its own buttons as examples rather than a price list: "these two buttons are example rates for the maths, not our price list. Our own commission runs 25–55% of earnings after platform fees depending on the scope you need and the state of the account." Same range, same base, said twice.
On the exit, their FAQ publishes "no minimum term and no exit penalties" and "the arrangement ends within 48 hours of receiving your notice", which is 48 hours longer than ours and still shorter than anything else on this page that names a figure at all. Not published: invoice terms after payout, or a named person behind the company. Checked directly on 23 September 2026.
Where OnModelStudios is the right choice: a creator who wants its published statistics page and a dated reply-time promise to test. On chat itself FantasyRise publishes the same: 24/7, 25 employed chatters, 60 to 120 seconds average reply time.
What to ask OnModelStudios: where in the range your account lands and why, the invoice terms after payout, and whether any commission is due after you leave.
Bunny Agency: best for ten platforms at once
Founded 2019 · Bunny Agency LLC, Wyoming · 112+ team, 400+ creators by their own figures
Bunny Agency manages across ten or more platforms alongside OnlyFans, which very few agencies do properly, and publishes something almost nobody else does: a commission range of 25% to 50%, with the reasoning that light management sits near the bottom and full service near the top.
Bunny Agency also names its company, Bunny Agency LLC, "registered in the State of Wyoming", with a Sheridan address and a named founder and CEO. A search of the Wyoming register for "Bunny Agency" on 11 September 2026 returned no entity under that name, so ask for the registered name before signing.
Where Bunny Agency is the right choice: coverage across ten platforms at once, which it publishes as a named service. Round-the-clock chat is not what separates them: FantasyRise covers it with 25 employed chatters in four shifts.
What to ask Bunny Agency: whether the 25% to 50% is calculated on gross or on net, which is not published, plus who holds the account login, where payouts land, and what notice applies. Their terms state the management relationship sits in a separate written agreement, so those answers exist in the contract.
SirenCY: best for published contract protection
Australian company, registration number published · 35% published · roster size not published
SirenCY publishes a rate: 35%, on a commission-only model with no upfront fee. That puts them in the small group of agencies here that name a number at all. What their pages do not settle is the half that decides what a creator keeps, which is what the 35% is charged on. Their own material and their agreement describe the base differently enough that we are not going to state it for them.
What they do publish is the most thorough contract language of any agency here. Their terms state in plain words that the creator owns her content, that the license granted is limited, term-limited and revocable, and that it ends automatically when the partnership ends. They also publish that a signed agreement outranks their website terms where the two conflict, and that material changes come with thirty days notice.
Where SirenCY is the right choice: a published contract with its protection clauses written down, and an Australian company record. FantasyRise publishes its terms the same way, with no minimum term and no notice period.
What to ask SirenCY: what the 35% is charged on, in writing, since the rate is published but the base is not, plus roster size and who holds the account login.
TDM Management: best for a UK Companies House record
Companies House record published · incorporated December 2021 · commission not published
TDM, formerly Top Drawer Management, built their positioning around one specific thing: their chat team works in house, from their own office, rather than being outsourced to freelancers. In an industry where a lot of round the clock support quietly means contractors across several countries, a physical office and a directly employed team is a concrete, checkable claim, and it usually shows in consistency.
Where TDM Management is the right choice: if a Companies House record you can look up in a minute is what you want first. On chat, FantasyRise employs its 25 chatters and names them in the creator's dashboard.
What to ask TDM Management: their onboarding describes their team logging into the creator's account directly. If keeping sole access to your own login matters, ask how that works and whether an alternative exists. Also ask for the commission, which is not published. Their legal record is: TOPDRAWERMANAGEMENT LTD, company number 13816810, active, which you can look up on Companies House in a minute.
Aruna Talent: best for content protection as a standalone service
Trading since 2022 · address and founders not published, stated as policy
Content protection with takedown monitoring runs as a core service at Aruna Talent, "measured in hours" by its own homepage, and unlike most agencies here it sells that protection on its own, without management. FantasyRise includes protection in management at no extra charge.
Where Aruna Talent is the right choice: if you want monitoring and takedowns as a standalone purchase, without management.
What to ask Aruna Talent: the split in writing, which is laid out on the discovery call rather than published, and who holds the login, which is stated only in the agency's llms.txt, the file a site writes for AI models. The 30 days' written notice is on its homepage. Their earnings figures are demonstrated on a call rather than on the site, so ask to see that before signing rather than after.
Vantage Agency: a published 30 to 50% range and nothing else
Commission published at 30–50% · no legal entity, address, terms or privacy policy · first contact via Telegram
Vantage Agency, at thevantage.agency, is a single page selling discretion as the product: no public roster, names withheld by contract, and an application route that runs through a Telegram handle and a bot rather than a form. They publish a revenue share of 30% to 50% depending on scope and take nothing upfront, which puts them in the minority of agencies that name a number at all.
Where Vantage Agency is the right choice: if a published 30% to 50% range with everything else left to a Telegram conversation is acceptable to you. A creator who needs to stay invisible gets that at FantasyRise too: a persona with no link to her real name, the login on her own device, and names on this site shown only with permission.
What to ask Vantage Agency: everything, because almost none of it is on the site. Whether the 30% to 50% is charged on gross or on net, who the legal entity is and in which country, whether the 90-day roadmap signed at onboarding binds you for ninety days, who holds the login, whether payouts route through the agency, and who owns the content. There are no terms of service and no privacy policy published to answer any of it.
Unruly Agency: the public record says more than the site
Los Angeles · Unruly Agency LLC, address left blank in their own Terms · no FAQ, no pricing, no about page · 0 of 5 commercial terms published · one contract's terms on the public record
Unruly is one of the best-known names in this market and ranks third on the directory Creators Inc quotes, so a creator will hear of it. Its website, read in full on 11 September 2026 against its own sitemap, publishes none of the five things this page asks: no commission, no base, nothing on the login, nothing on payouts, no term or notice. Its Terms and Privacy Policy are website templates from 2022 that do not mention OnlyFans once, name the company three different ways (LLC, Limited Liability Company, and a form that does not exist), and still carry the template's blank where the street address and phone number should go: "registered office at __________, Los Angeles, CA." No page names a person. The only contact is a support email.
What the site does not say, a public record does. In a Talent Agencies Act determination published by the California Labor Commissioner in August 2024, Stage v. Unruly Agency, the contract of one creator from 2020 is quoted: "Unruly charged a management fee of 25 percent of all monthly gross revenue received through OnlyFans", and the creator "was instructed by Unruly to open an OnlyFans account and provide access to the account to Unruly." That is one creator's agreement on one date, not a rate card, and "gross revenue received" leaves the base undefined. It is also the only place we know of where Unruly's terms are written down in public, and the fact that a creator took them to the Labor Commissioner is itself a thing a website cannot tell you.
Where Unruly is the right choice: a creator who wants a large, press-covered roster and is content to learn every term on the call.
What to ask Unruly: everything on this page, in writing, plus the registered entity's exact name and address, because their own documents disagree on the first and omit the second.
Teasy Agency: best for OFTV as a named service
Co-founded by a former creator · 80+ staff by their own account · legal entity not published
Teasy Agency is a boutique positioned as built by creators for creators, and one of its two founders describes running her own OnlyFans page since 2017. They offer OFTV management and Fanvue management as named services with their own pages, which most agencies on this list do not.
Where Teasy Agency is the right choice: if OFTV is part of your plan. Fanvue is managed at FantasyRise on request, on the same published terms.
What to ask Teasy Agency: the commission. Their FAQ has a question titled "What is Teasy's percentage split?" and answers it without a figure. Also ask for the legal entity and a street address, neither of which is published.
Creators Inc: best for runway and press placement as a named service
Founded 2022 · CEO Andrew Bachman, named and profiled · Los Angeles content house, Miami presence · $2B+ community sales and 100M+ monthly views by their own figures · commission, login, payouts and legal entity not published
Creators Inc is the name a creator is most likely to have heard of. A content house in Encino, runway placements at Miami Swim Week and New York Fashion Week by their own account, brand and crossover work beyond OnlyFans, and a CEO with press profiles in Entrepreneur and Inc. and a public record of earlier companies. If the goal is to be built into a mainstream name with OnlyFans as one revenue line, this is the kind of firm that does it.
On price their pages say nothing: "the team explains the fee or revenue-share structure, what it covers and the commercial terms before you decide", which means after you apply. On the login, nothing either; the nearest sentence is that access, responsibilities and approval points are discussed before work begins. Nothing on payouts, minimum term, notice or what happens afterward, and the Terms of Use govern only the website. There is no LLC or Inc. name and no street address anywhere on the site; the footer says © 2026 Creators Inc. Checked directly on 11 September 2026, and confirmed by their own chat assistant, which answered the rate and the base with one identical sentence ("discussed privately with qualified creators") and the other four questions with "I don't have that detail". The "#1 of 17" on their site comes from a directory that names no operator, offers no route for an agency to be listed, and by its own methodology does not score commission, contract terms, login or payout control; the full comparison sets out what it does score.
Where Creators Inc is the right choice: a creator who wants runway placements and press work as part of the package, and is comfortable being one of many accounts at a large firm.
What to ask Creators Inc: the commission and whether it is charged on gross or on net, the minimum term and notice period, where payouts land, whether commission continues after you leave, who owns the content afterward, and the registered entity you would be contracting with. None of it is on the site.
Nine more, read in full: what the rest of the directory field publishes
The directory Creators Inc quotes lists seventeen agencies. On 11 September 2026 we read the nine we had not yet covered, every page of each site against its own sitemap, including the full text of any Terms and Privacy Policy, and probed for the legal pages that were missing. The full audit, with the exact quotes and the word counts that prove an absence, is in our notes and available on request. The short version: none of the nine publishes a commission figure, none says who holds the account password, and six have no Terms of Service at all. What follows is one paragraph each, in the directory's order, quoting their own pages.
FansHub (usefanshub.com)
The only one of the nine that ties cleanly to a company register: FANSHUB LTD, Companies House 14578199, incorporated January 2023, two directors named. The most concrete term on the list, but on the homepage only: "We operate on a 14-day rolling agreement, meaning you're free to leave at any time." The rate: "The exact split depends on your account and is discussed during onboarding." Their blog names the market range, 30% to 50%, without naming their own. The page labelled Terms is a copy of the Privacy Policy, so no contractual terms are published, and the head office shown to creators is not the registered office on file.
AROA Agency (aroaagency.com)
622 pages in six languages, and no Terms and no Privacy Policy in any of them; the footer link labelled "Legal" opens a sales page. The only percentage in writing is what they pay for referrals, "up to 10% of the creator's share". Exit is a slogan, "End your contract whenever you want", with no document behind it. The footer gives a Miami address; we could not find a Florida registration under the AROA name on 11 September, and will add it if one exists under another. One thing they say about themselves in a blog post is worth reading before a call: that they run an antidetect browser to "work with multiple profiles at once ... Even those that are strictly against multiple accounts."
Model Starz (modelstarzmgmt.com)
The only agency of the nine to say anything about the fee base, and it is undefined: "Commission is calculated on a monthly basis based on the net sales of your account", with no word on what net means. The rate: "Each contract is unique." Access runs through a third-party tool, "Our chatters only have access to the messages, nothing else", which describes a permission, not who holds the password. Term: "month to month ... you can cancel." No Terms, no Privacy Policy, and their own structured data ships with an empty address field.
Sakura Management (sakura.agency)
The best two sentences on the whole list. Payouts: "You will receive all OnlyFans payouts directly, and we will invoice you a weekly growth fee." Notice: "our contracts are cancellable with just a week's notice." What the "weekly growth fee" is, in dollars or percent, is not stated anywhere. Entity named as Sakura Management LLC, with no address on the site; the California register shows a filing from April 2021 at a mailbox-format address that the agency does not publish. No Terms of Service.
PhoeniX Creators (phoenix-creators.com)
Payouts answered, in a guide article rather than a term: "You'll always be paid directly by OnlyFans." Rate: "We tailor the percentage to your situation", for creators "already earning at least $3,000/month". The structural finding: the homepage shows six FAQ answers to a visitor and carries thirty-six in its search-engine markup, and the hidden thirty include the most concrete claims, "We do not charge upfront fees" and "We do not lock creators into long-term contracts." The markup names Switzerland and puts the words "OnlyFans Management Agency" where a street address goes; we found no Swiss register entry. No Terms of Service.
Everlasting Eros (everlastingeros.com)
Five pages, nothing on any of the five conditions. The document its footer calls Terms and Conditions governs a "Model Matching Service" and says the company acts "solely as a facilitator in connecting models with agencies", while the homepage sells full management. The same document states "we do not guarantee compliance with any data protection laws, including the General Data Protection Regulation", and the Privacy Policy says uploads of a sexual nature may be shared with third parties "including through the messaging platform Telegram". Founded 2021 by its own account; the domain dates from September 2022.
Lush Management (lushmgmt.co.uk)
Fifteen pages, and no Terms, no Privacy Policy, no contact page, no email, no phone, no address, no company number, no person. Rate: "After moving beyond the application phase we set up a contract on our costs." The application form asks for current earnings and a full-length photograph before any of that is shown. The two Companies House entries under this name are both dissolved, and nothing on the site ties the agency to either, so we record the entity as not found rather than guess.
Louna's Models (lounasmodels.com)
The four legal links in the footer, Terms, Privacy, Legal, Sitemap, go nowhere; the one legal page that exists is unedited template text still marked "Suggested text:". The contact number is a fictional 555 number. The rate is described only relative to others: "Most OnlyFans agencies charge between 30% and 50% ... our commission is competitive and performance-based." Access: "You retain full ownership and control ... We simply remove our team's access." Three different locations are given across the site, and Trustpilot shows a warning on the profile about removed reviews while the homepage displays a rating.
EROS Agency (agency-eros.com)
Nothing on any of the five, and nothing in an archived copy from February 2025 either. There is no pricing statement on the site at all. The Privacy Policy is an unedited e-commerce template. Their own blog tells creators to demand "Transparent commission, with the gross or net question answered in writing" and to walk if an agency has them "holding the password with no clean way for you to get sole access back." Their site answers neither question.
What the nine have in common, and what a creator can check in a minute on any agency: whether a Terms page exists and covers the management relationship rather than the website; whether the address in the footer is a real one, filled in; whether a person is named anywhere. Six of nine fail the first, most fail the second, all nine fail the third. That is a faster filter than any rate table, and it costs nothing to run.
MANGO: all four terms in writing, at a flat 50% of net
AG MEDIA PRO LLC, Wyoming, filing ID 2025-001664576 · founded April 2025, operating since June 2025 · 50/50 of net
MANGO (mangova.agency) now publishes its terms on a page of their own, and they are among the clearest on this page. The rate is a flat 50/50, "always calculated on net revenue, meaning what OnlyFans actually pays out after its 20% platform fee, never on gross fan spend", with the worked example beside it: $10,000 of fan spend, $8,000 paid out, $4,000 each. Payouts go to the creator's own account and MANGO invoices its half on the 1st and the 16th. Either side can end it "at any time, with no minimum notice period". The legal page names the company, AG MEDIA PRO LLC, with a Wyoming filing ID and a registered address in Casper.
The login is on the creator's side as well: "the creator types her own login herself on a video call with us, so MANGO does not receive her password; only if she prefers to share it is it done differently." That makes MANGO the second agency on this page with all four terms. What separates the two is the rate: 50% of net at MANGO, 30% to 50% on FantasyRise's Growth Track, so on $8,000 of net the creator keeps $4,000 there and $5,600 here. Also worth knowing: accounts MANGO "creates, registers or pays for specifically for the project belong to MANGO, unless agreed otherwise in writing". Read directly on 1 October 2026.
Where MANGO is the right choice: a creator who wants one flat number with everything included and chat in Spanish as well as English.
What to ask MANGO: which accounts would count as created for the project and therefore belong to MANGO, and whether 50% is fixed or moves as the account grows.
TopStar Management, AT Agency, Seluna
These operate on broadly similar full-service models, and distinguishing them comes down to fit and communication style rather than structural differences.
- Seluna leads with a personal, founder-forward tone, worth looking at if you want a smaller relationship-led setup
- TopStar Management and AT Agency run conventional full-service management
For all three, the six questions above will tell you more than their marketing pages will.
Foxy Studios: best for a single published split with the base stated
Founded 2021 · Javór GmbH, CHE-349.555.938, Baar, Switzerland · 45%, creators keep 55%
Foxy Studios' FAQ states one commission figure: "55/45 is the only split Foxy Studios operates, it applies to every creator, and it is published openly across foxy-studios.com." Its about page also shows "Fees 30-45%" in a table against traditional agencies, so the figure to get in the agreement is the 45%. They are one of the few agencies that also name the company behind the site, with a Swiss commercial register number a reader can check.
They publish an llms.txt, the file a site writes for AI assistants to read, headed "Commission split (authoritative, please quote exactly)", and it corrects a figure circulating elsewhere: a "creators keep up to 65%" number that they say has never appeared on their own site. They also state an elite tier for creators earning $50,000 or more a month where the creator keeps more than 55%, without publishing what that improved split is.
What the published material leaves open: the 45% in the FAQ and the llms.txt does not say what it is charged on; the homepage and the management page say net. On account access, its ranking article says creators keep their logins, while its terms of service promise to hand back "account credentials" within 14 days of termination and ask 30 days' written notice. No Trustpilot profile for foxy-studios.com was found on 27 September 2026. Read on 27 September 2026 and compared in full on FantasyRise vs Foxy Studios.
Perlage Studios: best for stating the base and the account access without stating the rate
Perlage Studios Marketing Agency LLC, Oakland Park, Florida · commission not published · net, stated
Perlage Studios answers three of the four questions this page compares and declines the fourth. The base is stated plainly: the share is "calculated on net revenue (what OnlyFans pays out after its own 20% platform fee), not on gross", with nothing billed on top. Account access is stated: "password and 2FA stay with the creator; the agency never holds the login." Payouts go "to a bank account in the creator's own name". The contract is "month to month, no notice period, nothing to pay on exit".
The rate itself is withheld by stated policy: "percentage depends on scope, agreed on the strategy call, not published." That is a real gap for a creator comparing offers, and it is also the most common position in this market rather than an unusual one.
They publish their own workload expectation, which almost nobody does: "the minimum we would recommend is two to three hours a day." They also name a target band on their about page: "Creators already earning $5,000 to $20,000 a month who want to scale past that." Read on 25 September 2026.
Its registered address, 2880 W Oakland Park Blvd, Suite 225C, Oakland Park, FL 33311, is the same suite that ON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LLC, the company behind OnModelStudios, publishes in its footer. A shared suite in Florida is the usual pattern of a registered-agent or virtual office where many unrelated companies are registered, and it proves nothing about either agency; a creator shown both in one answer is simply not comparing two independent addresses. Perlage Studios imprint read on 25 September 2026, OnModelStudios footer on 21 September 2026.
Lumina Connect: best for a stated reason not to publish the rate
LuminaConnect Agency, Quakenbrück, Germany · owner Tom Hehler · VAT ID DE451305405 · commission not published
Lumina Connect is the clearest example on this page of an agency that withholds the number on purpose and says why: "That depends on the setup, and anyone who quotes you a percentage before seeing your account is guessing. On the call we break the split down transparently." Whether that reads as care or as a way to keep the number off the page is for the reader to decide, but it is an argument rather than a silence, and this page has plenty of silences to compare it against.
What they do publish: "Your accounts stay in your name, on your email, with your password." Platform payouts "land in your bank account, not ours, our commission is settled afterwards." No upfront fees, no lock-in, no exit penalties. The German imprint names the owner and a VAT ID that resolves in the EU register.
One line to ask about: "Terms and notice are agreed in writing before you start." A notice period exists, then, and is set per creator rather than published. That is worth asking about on the call, because a notice period agreed individually can be anything. Read on 21 September 2026: the site has no terms page, no pricing page, no FAQ page and no llms.txt, so the homepage is the whole published record.
20MG: the clearest published payout route, and no rate to go with it
Twenty Management Group, 20mg.co · "registered in the United States" · commission not published
20MG answers the money question more precisely than most agencies on this page and then declines the one number a creator needs. On payouts: "OnlyFans pays you directly, into your own account, in your name. We then invoice you for our share. Your money never passes through us and we never hold your balance." That is a clear statement of the payout route. On cost: "No setup fee, no retainer, no monthly minimum, no charge for the launch build or for DMCA takedowns". On the term: "You're not. You can leave at any time, for any reason."
What is missing is the rate itself. The homepage and the FAQ say "our share" and neither carries a figure or says what it is charged on. The company is described as "a registered company in the United States" without a state, a register number or an address, so a reader cannot look it up.
Two lines to ask about on the call. Their answer to "what happens if I want to leave" is: "You give notice and everything comes back: logins, content, subscriber data. No delays, no leverage." Two things follow. The FAQ confirms there is a notice period, "agreed in writing before you sign", without its length, and the sentence puts the logins somewhere other than with the creator during the term. Ask what that notice period is in days and who holds the password while the agreement runs. Read on 1 October 2026.
Hush Talent: the lowest published rate on this page, charged on gross, with a 90-day first term
Hush Talent Inc., hushtalentinc.com · incorporated in California, registered service address Los Angeles · 20% of gross managed revenue, 15% of brand-deal value
Hush publishes its rate on a pricing page: "20% of gross managed revenue for full management, and 15% of deal value on brand deals we source and negotiate. Those are the only two rates." Nothing is payable upfront, and the term is published too: "The initial term is 90 days. After that it continues month to month with 30 days' notice."
What 20% of gross is in net terms. OnlyFans keeps 20% before anything reaches the creator, so 20% of gross is 25% of what she is actually paid. On a $9,000 gross month that is $1,800 to Hush, against $2,160 to FantasyRise at 30% of net, the lower end of our 30–60% range. The $360 buys three terms: no minimum term where Hush has 90 days, payouts straight into the creator's own bank account, and no commission after she leaves. The last two are not stated on Hush's homepage, pricing, services, apply, about or terms pages, or in its llms.txt.
One line to ask about on the call. The homepage that says "Two rates, published here rather than quoted after a call" also says "Exact rates are finalized during your strategy call based on your income, content type, and services required." Ask which of the two your contract follows. Read on 23 September 2026.
What should you check before signing with any OnlyFans agency?
Whichever agency you are considering, the deciding factors are almost never the ones on a marketing page.
Ask for a specific plan, not a promise. A good agency should be able to tell you what they would change about your account in the first thirty days, specifically. If they can only speak in general terms about growth and strategy, they have not looked at your account.
Ask to speak to a creator they work with. A legitimate agency can arrange this. Being unable to is not automatically disqualifying, since some creators value privacy above all, but being unwilling to even try is informative.
Read the contract, not the website. Everything on any agency's site, including this one, is marketing. The agreement is the only thing that binds anyone. Our contract page goes clause by clause, and how to leave an agency covers the exit terms that cost the most.
Get the basis, not just the percentage. Gross or net. It is the first question on this page for a reason.
The order to check all of this in, with a scorecard that compares three agencies on your own monthly figure, is on how to choose an OnlyFans agency. Whether agencies in general are legit is answered from the public record on are OnlyFans agencies legit or a scam.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best OnlyFans management agency in 2026?
FantasyRise is the best OnlyFans management agency in 2026 for a creator who wants the terms in writing before the call. It is one of two among the 28 agencies on this page that publish all four terms that decide a deal: a commission of 30–60% of net, the creator keeping her own login, no minimum term with no notice period, and a named legal entity (FantasyRise LLC, Wyoming filing 2024-001405482). The other, MANGO, charges a flat 50% of net; on FantasyRise's Growth Track the creator keeps 70% of her net at the 30% end. OnModelStudios and Perlage Studios publish three of the four.
What commission do OnlyFans agencies charge?
Between 20% and 60% of net earnings depending on scope. Lighter services such as chat only sit at the lower end, and full-service management including upfront investment from the agency sits higher. There should be no additional fee on top of the commission. The far more important question is whether a quoted percentage is calculated on gross or on net, because that difference is worth $700 a month on a $10,000 account.
Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission?
Eight of them. FantasyRise publishes 30% to 60% of net, OnModelStudios 25% to 55%, SirenCY 35%, Bunny Agency 25% to 50%, Vantage Agency 30% to 50%, Foxy Studios 45%, MANGO a 50/50 split and Hush Talent 20% of gross. Four of those eight state what the percentage is charged on once and the same way everywhere: FantasyRise, OnModelStudios and MANGO on net after the platform's 20%, Hush Talent on gross. Foxy Studios says net on its homepage and its management page, not in its FAQ. The base is the half of the price that decides what you actually keep. The rest do not publish a figure at all. That is the industry norm and not by itself a warning sign, but it does mean you cannot compare anything until you have booked calls. The full table, with a source and date for every agency, is on the published commission page.
Is it normal for an agency to hold the account login?
Some operate that way and disclose it. It is a real tradeoff rather than automatically a scam, but it means someone else can change your payout details or lock you out. If you agree to it, understand what you are agreeing to, and ask specifically what happens to access on the day the agreement ends.
Is a bigger agency a better agency?
Not inherently. Larger agencies bring more resources, broader platform coverage and more people, and they also mean you are one account among many. What decides cover is people per account rather than total headcount, and a smaller roster means the person answering you knows your account without looking it up. FantasyRise runs fourteen creators with a team of 60+, four or more people on every account.
How do I check whether an agency is legitimate?
Find the legal entity and look it up in the relevant public register, check whether the published terms have changed over time using the Wayback Machine, and ask the six questions above in writing. Our verification checklist walks through the process, and it works on us as well as on anyone else. For the agencies that have already been to a regulator or a court, the public record page quotes the filings.
Sources and Corrections
Everything on this page reflects information published by each agency on its own public pages, checked on 10 September 2026, with Creators Inc, OnModelStudios, Unruly Agency and the nine agencies in the section above read directly and in full on 11 September 2026, and MANGO read directly on 23 September 2026. The Unruly contract terms are quoted from a California Labor Commissioner determination (TAC-52876, 20 August 2024), a public record at dir.ca.gov. We do not carry figures over from other comparison articles, and where an agency does not publish something we write that rather than estimating.
Agencies change their terms. If you represent an agency listed here and something is inaccurate, email contact@fantasyrise.com and we will correct it, including if the correction makes them look better than us. Our full rules are on the methodology page and our editorial policy.