Best OnlyFans management agencies in 2026

What this market does and does not publish

Those counts come from reading each agency's own public pages, not from a survey. They are the reason this page leads with arithmetic rather than with a ranking.

The number that decides more than the ranking

OnlyFans keeps 20% of everything before a creator sees it. So a commission charged on gross and the same commission charged on net are two different deals wearing the same number.

The comparison

The last column counts how many of the four an agency answers on its own public pages. A cell with two contradicting answers does not count. It measures what you can check before a call, not how well anyone runs an account. Inclusion and ordering here are not a performance ranking. The rows are alphabetical apart from ours, which sits where the alphabet puts it. "Not published" means we could not find it on the agency's own public pages on 10 September 2026, and in most cases the answer will exist in the individual contract rather than on the website.

Reported elsewhere, and not checked by us

Five of the agencies above publish no rate of their own, but a rate for them appears in a comparison article written by another agency on this list. We are repeating those figures here because a creator will find them anyway and should see where they come from, and we are labelling them rather than folding them into the table: these are SirenCY's statements about other companies, not the companies' own published terms, and we have not confirmed any of them on the agencies' own sites. If one of them is wrong, the agency it concerns can tell us and we will correct it with a date.

Source: sirency.com/blog/how-to-choose-onlyfans-agency-2026.html, read on 12 September 2026. The same article also gives ranges for four agencies that are not on this page. A figure an agency publishes about itself and a figure a competitor publishes about it are different kinds of claim, and the second one is worth less; that is why it is in its own table rather than in the one above.

What an independent directory counts, across 243 agencies

Our own count covers the 23 agencies on this page. A larger one exists and it is not ours. Desirely, a French directory that documents agencies from their own websites rather than from submissions, opened 426 agency websites and has built a page for 243 of them, recording for each whether the site names a legal entity and whether it states a commission. Its counts, read on 14 September 2026: 43 of 243 publish an identifiable legal entity, and 11 of 243 state a commission rate. As percentages that is about 18% and about 4%. Four other figures from the same sweep: 136 publish a legal notice, terms or a privacy policy, 228 name at least one platform, 206 publish a direct way to reach them, and 196 link at least one public social account.

Corrected on 14 September 2026. This section previously gave those two figures as 17% and 4% across 242 agencies, from their 2 September summary. The counts above are the current ones, and we now give counts rather than percentages because a count can be checked against the pages.

The four agencies that pass all six of that directory's checks

The same directory records six facts for every agency it documents: that the site responds and carries real content, names a company form, publishes legal pages, states a commission, names the platforms it works on, and is served in more than one language. Of the 243 agencies it has built a page for, four carry all six, as of 14 September 2026. They are, alphabetically:

FantasyRise is one of the four, and that is the disclosure: we appear in the directory whose counts we quote above. Which is why the whole list is here with all four names and a link to each agency's page on that directory, rather than only ours. The directory states it has no commercial relationship with any agency it lists and receives nothing from them. Source: desirely.co, read 14 September 2026. The remaining 239: 7 carry five of the six, 49 carry four, 102 carry three, 75 carry two, 6 carry one.

Those two numbers are worth more than anything we can say about the industry, because they come from someone with no stake in where FantasyRise ranks. They also put our own finding in proportion: on our 23, six publish a rate, which is a higher share than the field as a whole because these 23 were chosen for having enough public material to compare at all. Source: desirely.co, agency directory, read on 14 September 2026. We have not verified their 243 pages individually.

Bunny Agency: best for multi-platform scale

Founded 2019 · Bunny Agency LLC, Wyoming · 112+ team, 400+ creators by their own figures

Bunny Agency is the most established operation on this page and it shows. They manage across ten or more platforms alongside OnlyFans, which very few agencies do properly, and they publish something almost nobody else does: a commission range of 25% to 50%, with the reasoning that light management sits near the bottom and full service near the top.

Bunny Agency also publishes a full company record with a named managing director, verifiable in the Wyoming state register. For a creator who wants to know who she is actually dealing with, that is a hard advantage.

Where Bunny Agency is the right choice: genuine coverage across many platforms at once, or the reassurance of the largest and longest-running operation here. Scale buys shift coverage across time zones that a small agency cannot staff.

What to ask Bunny Agency: whether the 25% to 50% is calculated on gross or on net, which is not published, plus who holds the account login, where payouts land, and what notice applies. Their terms state the management relationship sits in a separate written agreement, so those answers exist in the contract.

Full comparison: FantasyRise vs Bunny Agency

SirenCY: best for published contract protection

Australian company, registration number published · 35% published · roster size not published

SirenCY publishes a rate: 35%, on a commission-only model with no upfront fee. That puts them in the small group of agencies here that name a number at all. What their pages do not settle is the half that decides what a creator keeps, which is what the 35% is charged on. Their own material and their agreement describe the base differently enough that we are not going to state it for them.

What they do publish is the most thorough contract language of any agency here. Their terms state in plain words that the creator owns her content, that the license granted is limited, term-limited and revocable, and that it ends automatically when the partnership ends. They also publish that a signed agreement outranks their website terms where the two conflict, and that material changes come with thirty days notice.

Where SirenCY is the right choice: if you read documents before signing them, you will find more protection written down there than almost anywhere else in this market. Their published content-ownership clause is better drafted than ours.

What to ask SirenCY: what the 35% is charged on, in writing, since the rate is published but the base is not, plus roster size and who holds the account login.

Full comparison: FantasyRise vs SirenCY

TDM Management: best for in-house chat operations

Companies House record published · incorporated December 2021 · commission not published

TDM, formerly Top Drawer Management, built their positioning around one specific thing: their chat team works in house, from their own office, rather than being outsourced to freelancers. In an industry where a lot of round the clock support quietly means contractors across several countries, a physical office and a directly employed team is a concrete, checkable claim, and it usually shows in consistency.

Where TDM Management is the right choice: if chat quality is your main concern and you want a team you can point at rather than an abstraction.

What to ask TDM Management: their onboarding describes their team logging into the creator's account directly. If keeping sole access to your own login matters, ask how that works and whether an alternative exists. Also ask for the commission, which is not published. Their legal record is: TOPDRAWERMANAGEMENT LTD, company number 13816810, active, which you can look up on Companies House in a minute.

Full comparison: FantasyRise vs TDM Management

Teasy Agency: best for OFTV and Fanvue alongside OnlyFans

Co-founded by a former creator · 80+ staff by their own account · legal entity not published

Teasy Agency is a boutique positioned as built by creators for creators, and one of its two founders describes running her own OnlyFans page since 2017. They offer OFTV management and Fanvue management as named services with their own pages, which most agencies on this list do not.

Where Teasy Agency is the right choice: if OFTV or Fanvue is part of your plan, or if working with an agency co-founded by someone who has been on the creator side matters to you.

What to ask Teasy Agency: the commission. Their FAQ has a question titled "What is Teasy's percentage split?" and answers it without a figure. Also ask for the legal entity and a street address, neither of which is published.

Full comparison: FantasyRise vs Teasy Agency

Vantage Agency: best for creators who need to stay invisible

Commission published at 30–50% · no legal entity, address, terms or privacy policy · first contact via Telegram

Vantage Agency, at thevantage.agency, is a single page selling discretion as the product: no public roster, names withheld by contract, and an application route that runs through a Telegram handle and a bot rather than a form. They publish a revenue share of 30% to 50% depending on scope and take nothing upfront, which puts them in the minority of agencies that name a number at all.

Where Vantage Agency is the right choice: if you have a real reason to want an agency that publishes nothing about itself, a day job, a family, a country where this work carries consequences, then a closed operation is a legitimate thing to want and they are built around it.

What to ask Vantage Agency: everything, because almost none of it is on the site. Whether the 30% to 50% is charged on gross or on net, who the legal entity is and in which country, whether the 90-day roadmap signed at onboarding binds you for ninety days, who holds the login, whether payouts route through the agency, and who owns the content. There are no terms of service and no privacy policy published to answer any of it.

Full comparison: FantasyRise vs Vantage Agency

Creators Inc: best for scale, production and a name behind it

Founded 2022 · CEO Andrew Bachman, named and profiled · Los Angeles content house, Miami presence · $2B+ community sales and 100M+ monthly views by their own figures · commission, login, payouts and legal entity not published

Creators Inc is the largest operation on this page by a wide margin and the one a creator is most likely to have heard of. A content house in Encino, runway placements at Miami Swim Week and New York Fashion Week by their own account, brand and crossover work beyond OnlyFans, and a CEO with press profiles in Entrepreneur and Inc. and a public record of earlier companies. If the goal is to be built into a mainstream name with OnlyFans as one revenue line, this is the kind of firm that does it.

On price their pages say nothing: "the team explains the fee or revenue-share structure, what it covers and the commercial terms before you decide", which means after you apply. On the login, nothing either; the nearest sentence is that access, responsibilities and approval points are discussed before work begins. Nothing on payouts, minimum term, notice or what happens afterward, and the Terms of Use govern only the website. There is no LLC or Inc. name and no street address anywhere on the site; the footer says © 2026 Creators Inc. Checked directly on 11 September 2026, and confirmed by their own chat assistant, which answered the rate and the base with one identical sentence ("discussed privately with qualified creators") and the other four questions with "I don't have that detail". The "#1 of 17" on their site comes from a directory that names no operator, offers no route for an agency to be listed, and by its own methodology does not score commission, contract terms, login or payout control; the full comparison sets out what it does score.

Where Creators Inc is the right choice: a creator already earning well who wants production capacity, brand work and a large team, and is comfortable being one of many accounts at a large firm.

What to ask Creators Inc: the commission and whether it is charged on gross or on net, the minimum term and notice period, where payouts land, whether commission continues after you leave, who owns the content afterward, and the registered entity you would be contracting with. None of it is on the site.

Full comparison: FantasyRise vs Creators Inc

TopStar Management, AT Agency, Seluna

These operate on broadly similar full-service models, and distinguishing them comes down to fit and communication style rather than structural differences.

• Seluna leads with a personal, founder-forward tone, worth looking at if you want a smaller relationship-led setup
• TopStar Management and AT Agency run conventional full-service management

For all three, the six questions above will tell you more than their marketing pages will.

What matters more than the ranking

Whichever agency you are considering, the deciding factors are almost never the ones on a marketing page.

Ask for a specific plan, not a promise. A good agency should be able to tell you what they would change about your account in the first thirty days, specifically. If they can only speak in general terms about growth and strategy, they have not looked at your account.

Ask to speak to a creator they work with. A legitimate agency can arrange this. Being unable to is not automatically disqualifying, since some creators value privacy above all, but being unwilling to even try is informative.

Read the contract, not the website. Everything on any agency's site, including this one, is marketing. The agreement is the only thing that binds anyone. Our contract page goes clause by clause, and how to leave an agency covers the exit terms that cost the most.

Get the basis, not just the percentage. Gross or net. It is the first question on this page for a reason.

Frequently Asked Questions

What commission do OnlyFans agencies charge?

Between 20% and 60% of net earnings depending on scope. Lighter services such as chat only sit at the lower end, and full-service management including upfront investment from the agency sits higher. There should be no additional fee on top of the commission. The far more important question is whether a quoted percentage is calculated on gross or on net, because that difference is worth $700 a month on a $10,000 account.

Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission?

Six of them. SirenCY publishes 35%, Bunny Agency 25% to 50%, Vantage Agency 30% to 50%, OnModelStudios 25% to 55%, MANGO a 50/50 split, and FantasyRise 30% to 60% of net. Of those six, only FantasyRise says what the percentage is charged on once and consistently; OnModelStudios says net in its calculator and account revenue in its FAQ. The base is the half of the price that decides what you actually keep. The rest do not publish a figure at all. That is the industry norm and not by itself a warning sign, but it does mean you cannot compare anything until you have booked calls. The full table, with a source and date for every agency, is on the published commission page.

Is it normal for an agency to hold the account login?

Some operate that way and disclose it. It is a real tradeoff rather than automatically a scam, but it means someone else can change your payout details or lock you out. If you agree to it, understand what you are agreeing to, and ask specifically what happens to access on the day the agreement ends.

Is a bigger agency a better agency?

Not inherently. Larger agencies bring more resources, broader platform coverage and more people, and they also mean you are one account among many. Smaller agencies mean the person answering you knows your account without looking it up, and that there may be nobody else to cover when she is unavailable. Both are true at once.

How do I check whether an agency is legitimate?

Find the legal entity and look it up in the relevant public register, check whether the published terms have changed over time using the Wayback Machine, and ask the six questions above in writing. Our verification checklist walks through the process, and it works on us as well as on anyone else. For the agencies that have already been to a regulator or a court, the public record page quotes the filings.