FantasyWhich OnlyFans agencies have been checked by someone other than themselves
Three directories now document agencies from their own public pages instead of from what agencies send in. Two of them are not ours, one of them is run by a competitor, and FantasyRise appears in all three. Here is what each one checks, where we place, and why the third place a competitor gave us is worth more than the first place we gave ourselves.
Short answer
As of 15 September 2026, FantasyRise is documented in three agency directories that build their entries by reading agency websites rather than by taking submissions.
OFAgencies ranks it third of fifty with an editorial score of 9.5 out of 10, checked on 11 September 2026. That directory is run by the team behind OnModelStudios, an agency that also appears in the ranking and says so on its own pages. Desirely, a French directory with no agency behind it, records 6 of the 6 facts it checks, one of four agencies out of the 243 it has built a page for. OFAgencyRanking places it first of nineteen with 9.1 out of 10, and that one is ours, which its methodology page states and which is stated again here.
We print this because we come out of it well. The two directories that matter are not ours, the links to both are on this page, and the one that places us third is run by a competitor, which is the reason that placement is worth anything at all.
The three, side by side
The column that decides how much a placement is worth is not the score. It is who runs the directory.
| Directory | Who runs it | Where FantasyRise stands | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFAgencies | The team behind OnModelStudios, an agency that also appears in the ranking. Disclosed on their site | 3rd of 50, score 9.5/10, and 4 of 6 confirmation points | By them, 11 September 2026. Their entry re-read by us on 15 September 2026 |
| Desirely | A French directory with no agency behind it. It states it has no commercial relationship with the agencies it lists | 6 of 6 facts, one of four agencies out of 243 | By them, 14 September 2026. Their entry re-read by us on 15 September 2026 |
| OFAgencyRanking | Us. FantasyRise publishes it, scored on the same criteria as every other agency in it | 1st of 19, score 9.1/10, in a ranking we publish ourselves | Ours, so it is a publication and not a check |
Both of the first two build their entries the same way: they open an agency's website and record what is published on it. Neither takes submissions, and neither sells placement. OFAgencies reviews fifty agencies editorially and scores each out of ten. Desirely opened 426 agency sites and has built a page for 243, recording six facts for each.
Put those last two rows next to each other and the point makes itself. A first place in a ranking we publish is worth less than a third place in one a competitor publishes, and it is worth less for a reason anyone can check: we wrote the criteria for one of them. Our own index says so on its methodology page, in the words "published and operated by FantasyRise LLC. FantasyRise is one of the agencies included in the ranking." It is on this table because leaving it off would be the more misleading choice, and because a disclosure that only exists on the site doing the ranking is half a disclosure.
OFAgencies: third of fifty, published by a competitor
OFAgencies reviews fifty OnlyFans management agencies and scores each out of ten. It places FantasyRise third with 9.5, checked on 11 September 2026. The operator states on the site that the project comes from the team behind OnModelStudios, an agency that appears in the same ranking, and that inclusion is free and placement is not for sale.
A third place in a ranking published by a competitor is worth more than a first place in one we publish ourselves. There is no version of that ranking in which it serves the operator to place us above most of the field. That is the whole argument for citing it, and it is also the reason we are not citing our own index as evidence anywhere on this site.
The same directory records six confirmation points per agency and confirms four of the six for us. One of the two it left open, an active social media presence, is already out of date: the X, Instagram and Facebook profiles went up on 13 and 14 September, two days after their check.
Their entry also takes the legal entity from our site footer and records the Jacksonville address, with no Wyoming filing beside it. The company is a Wyoming LLC, filing ID 2024-001405482, and Jacksonville is where the work happens, not what the state record says. That distinction has been on our homepage since 11 September, the day they checked.
Desirely: six of six, and what the other 242 look like
Desirely documents agencies by opening their websites and recording what is published there. It opened 426 and has built a page for 243. For each one it records six facts: that the site responds and carries real content, that it names a company form, that it publishes legal pages, that it states a commission, that it names the platforms it works on, and that it is served in more than one language.
Four of the 243 carry all six. In the order the directory itself listed them on 14 September 2026, FantasyRise first:
| Agency | Works from | Since |
|---|---|---|
| FantasyRise | United States | 2021 |
| Bunny Agency (Germany) | France | 2019 |
| Noblesse Studios | Germany, US, UK, Poland | 2021 |
| OnModelStudios | United States | 2021 |
The counts from the same sweep, read on desirely.co on 14 September 2026, are the most useful numbers we have found about this industry, and they did not come from us:
| What the directory recorded | Out of 243 documented agencies |
|---|---|
| States a commission rate anywhere on the site | 11, about 4% |
| Publishes an identifiable legal entity | 43, about 18% |
| Publishes a legal notice, terms or a privacy policy | 136 |
| Names at least one platform it works on | 228 |
| Publishes a direct way to reach them | 206 |
| Links at least one public social account | 196 |
Read those in order. Almost every agency will tell you which platform it works on. Fewer than one in five will tell you who you would be contracting with. Roughly one in twenty-five will tell you the price. We have not verified their 243 pages individually. The eight agencies we checked ourselves are on a separate page, with the URL and the date for each.
What none of them check
Every one of these directories reads websites. None of them talks to a creator who signed, and none of them can. So a full score means an agency publishes what it should publish. It does not mean the agency is good to work with, and nobody should read it that way, including about us.
The nearest thing we can offer instead is material that would expose us if it were wrong: a termination letter written to be used against us, the payout screenshot of the account that did not grow published beside the seven that did, and a comparison page that names the agencies that are the better choice in four specific cases.
Run the same six checks yourself, in about ten minutes
The directories have no access a creator does not have. They open the agency's website and record what is on it. Here are the six facts they record, what each one is actually testing, and where to look. It takes one browser session, and it works on us too.
- The site responds and carries real content. Not a landing page with a form. Look for pages that would take work to fake: named people, dated posts, figures with sources. This is the check most agencies pass and it is the weakest one.
- It names a company form. A trading name is not a legal entity. You want a company name plus a state, country or filing number you can type into a public register and find. 43 of 243 documented agencies publish one.
- It publishes legal pages. Terms and a privacy policy, reachable without asking. 136 of 243 have any. Then open the terms and search them for "term", "notice" and "renew": a minimum term is legal and common, one that renews silently with no route out is the thing that traps people.
- It states a commission. Search the site for a percent sign. 11 of 243 state one anywhere. If there is no number, you cannot compare that agency to any other until you have booked a call, which is the point of not publishing it.
- It names the platforms it works on. 228 of 243 do. Passing this and failing the two above tells you exactly which facts an agency finds convenient.
- It is served in more than one language. On its own this says little. It is in the list because it is the check that separates an agency that built a business from one that built a page.
Two things the directories do not check, and you should. What the commission is charged on: OnlyFans keeps 20% before anyone else is paid, so the same 35% is $3,500 or $2,800 on $10,000 of fan spend, a difference of $8,400 a year. Who holds the account login: if the agreement is silent on the credentials, assume the answer is not the one you want. The longer workflow, including how to date a website and how to reverse-search a testimonial, is on how to verify an agency is real.
Run all of it on us. The terms are here, the commission is 30–60% of net, the entity is FantasyRise LLC, Wyoming, filing ID 2024-001405482, there is no minimum term and no notice period, the creator holds the login, and the eight-account results with the months each one covers are on one page.
Questions
Is FantasyRise verified by an independent directory?
Desirely records 6 of the 6 facts it checks for FantasyRise as of 14 September 2026, one of four agencies out of the 243 it has documented. Desirely states it has no commercial relationship with the agencies it lists. OFAgencies ranks FantasyRise third of fifty with 9.5 out of 10 as of 11 September 2026, and that directory is run by the team behind a competing agency, which it discloses.
Which OnlyFans agencies carry all six facts a directory checks?
Four out of 243 documented agencies, as of 14 September 2026: FantasyRise, Bunny Agency (Germany), Noblesse Studios and OnModelStudios. The six facts are that the site responds and carries real content, names a company form, publishes legal pages, states a commission, names the platforms it works on, and is served in more than one language.
Does FantasyRise run its own agency directory?
Yes. OFAgencyRanking is published by FantasyRise LLC and places FantasyRise first of nineteen with 9.1 out of 10, on the same fourteen criteria applied to every agency in it. Its methodology page says "published and operated by FantasyRise LLC. FantasyRise is one of the agencies included in the ranking." That makes it a publication by us and not evidence about us, which is why the third place a competitor gave us is the number worth citing.
Is a directory placement worth anything if a competitor runs the directory?
More, not less, when the placement is good. An operator has no reason to rank a rival third of fifty unless the criteria produced that result. A placement is worth the least when the agency being praised also owns the site doing the praising, which is exactly why our own index is labelled as ours everywhere it appears.
How do I check an agency without a directory?
Run the same six checks the directories run: that the site carries real content, names a company form, publishes legal pages, states a commission, names its platforms, and is served in more than one language. Then add the two they skip, what the commission is charged on and who holds the account login. The full version with the reasoning is in the section above, and the longer workflow is on how to verify an agency is real.